My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - 19E
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2020
>
07/07/2020
>
CORRESPONDENCE - 19E
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/16/2020 8:20:14 AM
Creation date
7/7/2020 8:42:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Date
7/7/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Orozco, Norma <br />From: Dale Helvig <helvig_denny@msn.com> <br />Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2020 9:04 AM <br />To: eComment, Pulido, Miguel; Sarmiento, Vicente; Penaloza, David; Bacerra, Phil; <br />Villegas, Juan; Mendoza, Nelida <br />Cc: Ridge, Kristine; Carvalho, Sonia R.; Thai, Minh; Fregoso, Vince; McLoughlin, Mark <br />Subject: 2020-07-07 Letter to City Council <br />Attachments: 2020-07-07 Letter to City Council -Item 19E.pdf <br />Dale Helvig <br />2536 N. Valencia St. Santa Ana CA 92706 <br />714-541-7254 helvig_denny@msn.com <br />July 7, 2020 <br />Mayor Pulido and Santa Ana City Councilmembers <br />City of Santa Ana <br />20 Civic Center Plaza, 8th Floor <br />Santa Ana CA 92702 <br />Subject: July 7thAgenda Item 19E, RECEIVE AND FILE A STATUS REPORT REGARDING THE COMPREHENSIVE <br />UPDATE TO THE GENERAL PLAN <br />I was taken aback when I read agenda item 19E, even if it is listed as a General Plan status update. As the staff <br />report states, "Over 300 participants were in attendance at the focus area workshops and the survey tool <br />produced over 650 responses citywide." However, it appears these comments were not taken into <br />consideration as nothing has changed since presented to the public last year. The five focus areas do nothing <br />but replace General Commercial and Professional /Administrative Office zoning with District Centers. I think <br />it is safe to say this is one step closer to adding high -density housing to the focus areas. For a vision of the City <br />it lacks any consideration for open space/parks that are desperately needed. <br />These proposed changes to the General Plan Land Use Element do not agree with the General Plan Core <br />Values listed in the staff report for the five focus areas that are discussed. From the staff report: <br />"The five focus areas were selected based on input from the General Plan Advisory Group (GPAG); the <br />presence of existing and new high - quality transit areas such as the OC Streetcar line; opportunities to <br />connect key development areas; and, consistency with the following principles that align with General Plan <br />Core Values: <br />• Protect and enhance our cultural and community assets <br />• Create a land use pattern that promotes healthy and active lifestyles <br />• Ensure equitable outcomes and land use distributions <br />• Create a sustainable and livable city <br />• Promote lifelong education and prosperity" <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.