Laserfiche WebLink
For the most part the changes will convert existing zoning from General Commercial and Professional / <br />Administrative Office to District Centers, thus making it easier for developers to purchase these newly <br />rezoned areas and convert the area from commercial property to high -density housing at a density of 90 <br />dwelling units per acre. This is a windfall to developers and a huge loss to the identity of the City. Santa Ana <br />will no longer be known as education first, the Golden City or any other positive catch phrase the City comes <br />up with to put a positive spin on the City. What it will be known for is the City of high -density living. One will <br />know when they enter the City by the height of the apartments. Look at where the City is <br />headed: high -density housing at many entrances to the City. <br />Dyer & Redhill: The Heritage; isT and Tustin: Metro East Senior Park and the AMG Family Affordable <br />Apartments; Harbor and Westminster: The Charlie; 5th Street: The Willowick area; Harbor Blvd. And now you want to <br />include South Main St., North Grand Ave., 171" Street, South Bristol, Santa Ana Blvd., and Santa Ana east of the 55 <br />freeway. When does it stop? Where is the open space for the densest City in Orange County? <br />While I agree the City needs revenue, we cannot continue down this path of constantly increasing the density <br />of the City. The COVID pandemic highlights the negative effect high density has on the spreading of <br />viruses. Where do you want the City to be when the next pandemic occurs? <br />Furthermore, exhibits listed in the staff report have been omitted: <br />Exhibit 2. Environmental Justice Flyer and <br />Exhibit 3. General Plan Document Outline <br />Request: Receive and File with the caveat that you do not accept this draft. <br />On another note, I would like to correct a discrepancy on the Staff Report presentation for the Shelter that <br />was unanimously approved by City Council on on June 16th. The Illumination Foundation Proposal at 1815 <br />Carnegie incorrectly stated, "No residential within one-half mile of location". This is wrong as the Heritage is <br />within 0.25 miles and if approved, the Bowery would be within 0.25 miles. This is based on the same <br />rationale the City uses when public notifications are required for residents within 500 feet: you take the <br />property and draw a radius. Using a driving distance is not acceptable. <br />Thank you for your time. Stay safe, stay healthy. <br />Respectfully, <br />n A. It <br />Dale A Helvig <br />Resident, Santa Ana <br />cc: Kristine Ridge <br />City Manager, Santa Ana <br />Sonia Carvalho <br />City Attorney, Santa Ana <br />