My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75C - PH - THE BOWERY
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2020
>
08/18/2020
>
75C - PH - THE BOWERY
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/13/2020 5:10:27 PM
Creation date
8/13/2020 4:53:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
75C
Date
8/18/2020
Destruction Year
2025
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1021
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ciryof Sa wMa-The Bowery <br />May 11, 2020 <br />Page 24) of 28 <br />projects, and the effects of probable future projects." (CEQA Guidelines <br />�15065(a)(3); Banning Ranch Conservacg a City afNeavpotaBeach (2012) 211 Cal. App. 4th <br />1209, 1228; see also CEQA Guidelines 515355(b).) <br />A cumulative impacts analysis must include all "past, present, and probably fimirc <br />projects producing related or cumulative impacts" or "[al summary of projections <br />contained in an adopted local, regional or statewide plan, or related planning <br />document." (CEQA Guidelines 15130(b)(1-2)). A probable future project should be <br />considered once the environmental review for the project is underway. (San Franciscans <br />far Reasonable Growth v. City & County of San fr andsco (1984) 151 Cal. App. 3d 61.) <br />The City identified elevenprojects in Santa Ana, eight in Irvine, five m Tustin, <br />and two in Newport Beach when calculating the cumulative impacts for its <br />transportation analysis. While a list approach is acceptable under CEQA, the list <br />must include all past, present, and probably future projects that could contribute <br />to the Project's impacts. This cumulative impact analysis is flawed and should be <br />updated to include, at least, the potential impacts of the Congregate Care Facility <br />and Staybridge hotel in Irvine? T'he Congregate Care Facility is a 424,113 square <br />foot facility located just two miles south of the Project site; and the 200+ room <br />Staybridge Hotel will be located just one mile west of the Project site The <br />Congregate Care Facility project has already been approved by the City of Irvine, <br />and the Staybridge Motel is currently under construction. Both projects should <br />be considered in the City's CEQA analysis. <br />I. "Ibe QFIR Pails to Describe or AdopL Feasible Mitigation Measures <br />A fundamental purpose of an EIR is to identify ways in which a proposed <br />project's significant environmental impacts can be mitigated or avoided. (Pub. <br />Resources Code %21002.1(9), 21061.) To implement this statutory purpose, an <br />EIR must describe feasible mitigation measures that can minimize the project's <br />significant environmental effects. (CEQA Guidelines 4415121(a), 15126.4(a).) "A <br />gloomy forecast of environmental degradation is of little or no value without <br />pragmatic, concrete means to minimize the impacts and restore ecological <br />' The location and development stage of these projects may be found at <br />hops) 4ityofimuie maps a rcpis_min /ahps YGpTo� vl indeshtmllapped-04�665850 <br />ec4dcab5ba58%a497f42s, <br />22 <br />23 <br />75C-140 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.