Laserfiche WebLink
Additionally, these minor revisions to the Project would not result in any new significant impacts. The <br />clarification of the types of retail and restaurants that would be within the 80,000 square feet of <br />proposed commercial space are evaluated in the Final EIR Traffic Impact Analysis and revised EIR traffic <br />Section, which is provided in Chapter 3 of the Final EIR, and details that no new impacts would occur. Also, <br />the change to the residential parking spaces was initiated to provide consistency with other similar <br />developments in the City and to meet the anticipated parking need of the Project. The addition of 0.3 <br />parking spaces per residential unit within the same development area would provide additional parking <br />flexibility for Project residents and their guests and would not result in new impacts. Also, the addition of <br />PDF AQ-1 that would provide information about SCAQMD's Commercial Electric Lawn and Garden <br />Equipment Incentive and Exchange Program was provided in response to the SCAQMD comment letter that <br />was received. The intent of the measure is to encourage the use of electric landscaping equipment instead <br />of gas -powered equipment, which generates larger volumes of air pollutants. Implementation of the <br />measure is intended to reduce onsite emissions; and therefore, would not result in new impacts. <br />Comment 5: The comment asserts that modifications to the Project require recirculation of the EIR because <br />the Project's transportation analysis was revised based upon modifications to the Project. The comment <br />states that because VMT analysis and transportation analysis are required under CEQA, the failure of the <br />Draft EIR to include this information was an unlawful omission of information that requires revision and <br />recirculation and the Draft EIR was fundamentally and basically inadequate. <br />Response 5: CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5 sets forth the circumstances under which a lead agency <br />must recirculate an EIR. A lead agency is required to recirculate an EIR when significant new information is <br />added to the EIR after public notice is given of the availability of the Draft EIR but before certification of <br />the Final EIR has occurred. Such information can include changes in the project or environmental setting as <br />well as additional data or other information. New information added to an EIR is not considered <br />"significant" unless the EIR is changed in a way that deprives the public of a meaningful opportunity to <br />comment upon a substantial adverse environmental effect of the project or a feasible way to mitigate or <br />avoid such an effect (including a feasible project alternative) that the project's proponents have declined <br />to implement. As defined in CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5(a), significant new information requiring <br />recirculation is that which shows any of the following: <br />1. A new significant environmental impact would result from the project or from a new mitigation <br />measure proposed to be implemented. <br />2. A substantial increase in the severity of an environmental impact would result unless mitigation <br />measures are adopted that reduce the impact to a level of insignificance. <br />3. A feasible project alternative or mitigation measure considerably different from others previously <br />analyzed would clearly lessen the environmental impacts of the project, but the project's <br />proponents decline to adopt it. <br />4. The draft EIR was so fundamentally and basically inadequate and conclusory in nature that <br />meaningful public review and comment were precluded. <br />The Draft EIR adequately analyzes the environmental effects of the proposed Project, and the conclusions <br />in the Draft EIR are supported by substantial evidence in the record. None of the conditions requiring <br />recirculation listed in CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5 have been triggered, and recirculation of the <br />Draft EIR is not required. The minor clarifications, Project modifications, and editorial corrections made to <br />the Draft EIR are shown in Chapter 3 of the Final EIR. None of the revisions that have been made to the <br />Project or Draft EIR indicate new significant impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of an <br />environmental impact identified in the Draft EIR; and, none of the revisions identify a feasible project <br />alternative or mitigation measure that is considerably different from those set forth in the Draft EIR and <br />75C-192 <br />