75C - PH - THE BOWERY - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

which will lessen the environmental impacts of the Project. Furthermore, no new information brought forward indicates that the Draft EIR is so fundamentally flawed that it precludes meaningful public review. As none of the CEQA criteria for recirculation have been met, recirculation of the EIR is not warranted. As stated in CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5(b), "recirculation is not required where the new information added to the EIR merely clarifies or amplifies or makes insignificant modifications in an adequate EIR." As described in Response 4, the Final EIR evaluates revisions to the types of retail and restaurants that would be within the 80,000 square feet of proposed commercial space, which was evaluated in the Final EIR Traffic Impact Analysis and revised EIR traffic section, which is provided in Chapter 3 of the Final EIR, and details that no new impacts would occur. In addition, both the VMT analysis within the Draft EIR and Final EIR detail that significant impacts related to VMT would not occur from the Project. Therefore, all impacts have been adequately disclosed, and because no new information has been presented identifying new or different environmental impacts as a result of implementing the proposed Project, recirculation of the EIR is not warranted. Comment 6: The comment asserts that Draft EIR falsely claimed that the Project site is listed as a hazardous material site and failed to discuss the fact that the site may be located within a groundwater basin that is impacted by volatile organic compounds. The comment also asserts that the Draft EIR fails to disclose OCHA investigation data and potential risk to future receptors associated with groundwater contamination at the Project site. The comment further states that this requires revision and recirculation since the Draft EIR. Response 6: The comment is an inaccurate assertion. Section 5.7, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, of the Draft EIR (page 5.7-25), describes that the Project site is not included on a list of hazardous materials sites pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5. Section 65962.5(a)(4) requires that DTSC shall compile and update as appropriate, a list of hazardous substance release sites subject to a response action. The DTSC's list of sites are published in the DTSC "Envirostor" database at the following weblink: httr)s://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.ciov/public/search.asp?cmd=search&reporttvpe=CORTESE&site type=CSI TES.O P EN.FU DS.CLOS E&status=ACT.BKLG.COM&reporttitle=HAZARDOUS+WASTE+AND+SUBSTANCES +SITE+LIST. In addition, the sites are mapped on the DTSC website: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov. The Project site is not on the DTSC list or mapping. Regarding groundwater contamination, the history of onsite groundwater testing is provided in the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment in 2018, a Phase II Environmental Site Assessment in 2018, and a Limited Phase II Subsurface Investigation Report in 2019, which are provided as Appendix F of the Draft EIR. In addition, information is provided in Draft EIR Section 5.8, Hydrology and Water Quality. Specifically, areas of existing groundwater contamination are detailed on pages 5.8-6 through 5.8-9. As detailed on page 5.5-5 of the Draft EIR, the onsite borings conducted for the Project found groundwater between 24 to 33 feet below ground surface (bgs), but the historic high groundwater is approximately 10 feet below the existing grade. Due to the depth of groundwater, operation of the proposed residential and commercial uses would not result in contact with groundwater. Likewise, construction of the project is not anticipated to encounter groundwater. However, in the case that groundwater is encountered during Project construction, existing regulations require it to be treated and discharged. The federal Occupational Safety and Health Act Safety and Health Regulations for Construction contains requirements for construction activities, including health and safety plan(s). In addition, the CalOSHA required Injury and Illness Prevention Program (IIPP) would maintain worker safety related to potentially contaminated groundwater. Thus, implementation of construction pursuant to existing regulations as ensured through the permitting process would reduce potential impacts related to construction workers who may encounter contaminated groundwater when 75C-193