Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Jerry Guevara <br />The Bowery Project DEIR <br />February 5, 2020 <br />Page 3 <br />6, It is incorrectly stated on page 5.13-5 of the DEIR that 5,136.35 acres of parkland will be <br />provided per Project resident at full occupancy. <br />Table 5.18-3 appears to be missing a column for average travel times between 13 and 20 <br />minutes. <br />S. The project consists of 1,150 multi -family units and 80,000 square feet (SF) of commercial <br />uses broken down into 18,000 SF of retail and 62,000 SF of quality, casual sit-down, fast <br />food with and without drive -through and coffee/donut shop types of restaurant uses. The <br />project trip generation is 1,012 AM, 1,315 PM and 16,785 average daily trips (ADT). The use <br />of discounts to reduce project trip generation, such as internal and pass -by trips, results in a <br />projected reduction of project trips as great as 42% in the PM peak hour. The reduced <br />project trip generation with these discounts is 691 AM, 762 PM and 12,872 ADT. The use of <br />these trip discounts results in reduced anticipated off -site impacts. The City of Tustin <br />recommends that the worst -case scenario be presented rather than the best -case scenario. <br />it should be noted that the analysis for The Heritage Project at 2001 East Dyer Road did not <br />factor in pass -by trips to discount project trips. <br />9. The Industrial Park trip generation for the existing land use is higher than the trip <br />generation based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) industrial park <br />classification (i.e., per thousand square feet (TSF):.32 and .08 for AM in and out and PM in <br />and out and 3.37 for ADT). The use of the higher trip generation for existing uses results in <br />a reduced net trip generation change when compared to the proposed project, which would <br />not be the worst -case scenario. Again, a worst -case scenario should be used when <br />projecting trip generation for the proposed project. <br />10. A queuing analysis should be provided for the left -turn into Driveway 1 at Warner Avenue <br />to determine if the forecasted 290 vehicles in the PM peak hour can be accommodated in <br />the proposed left -turn pocket and not have a negative impact on through traffic. <br />11. Due to the high inbound southbound peak hour volume of 265 vehicles into Driveway 3 on <br />Red Hill Avenue, the City of Tustin recommends a dedicated right -turn lane to separate the <br />right -turns from through traffic in the #3 lane where speeds are 50 mph. The right -turn <br />pocket length should be based on Synchro. <br />12. At Red Hill Avenue and Warner Avenue, the northbound left -turn volume in the PM peak <br />hour increases from 578 to 860' with the project. Please demonstrate that the left -turn <br />pocket length for northbound Red Hill Avenue can accommodate the additional 282 <br />vehicles. <br />13. 2040 PM Peak Hour Mitigation: A right -turn overlap implies that there is a right -turn lane. <br />Will the project construct one and operate it with a right -turn overlap? To remain eligible <br />and qualify for Measure M funding, the City of Tustin does not support the conversion of <br />the #3 through lane into a right -turn lane which would result in a downgrade of Red Hill <br />Avenue. Should an alternative mitigation be selected, the City of Tustin's preference would <br />be the addition of a dedicated right -turn lane on eastbound Warner Avenue to serve the <br />high right -turn volume in the AM Peak Hour (i.e., 346 vehicles). <br />