My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - 75C
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2020
>
08/18/2020
>
CORRESPONDENCE - 75C
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2020 3:38:45 PM
Creation date
8/14/2020 11:38:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Date
8/18/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
131
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The Bowery Mixed -Use Project <br />CEQA Comment <br />May 11, 2020 <br />Page 19 <br />been approved. Without valid mitigation, the Project's significant hazardous materials impact <br />remains significant. <br />5. The EIR's conclusions related to hazardous impacts from contaminated <br />groundwater are not supported by substantial evidence. <br />The FIR must be revised to correct its inconsistent statements about the likelihood of <br />encountering contaminated groundwater during Project construction. The FEIR states: <br />[I]t is described on page 5.5-5 in Section 5.5, Geology and Soils, of the Draft FIR that <br />based on onsite borings the depth of groundwater is in the range of 24 to 33 feet below <br />ground surface (bgs). This depth of groundwater would not impact persons onsite during <br />operation of the proposed mixed -uses. Also, the Draft FIR page 3-19, Section 3.0, Project <br />Description, describes that excavation and grading during project construction would be a <br />minimum of 5 feet below the bottom of the building foundations. As the depth of <br />groundwater currently ranges between 24 to 33 feet, project excavation of approximately <br />5 feet below building foundations would not result in encountering groundwater. Thus, <br />construction workers would also not be in contact with, and therefore impacted by, <br />contaminated groundwater. Therefore, the potential risk to future receptors associated <br />with groundwater contamination would be less than significant. <br />FEIR, 2-8. <br />But SWAPE points out that the assertion that groundwater is in the range of 24 to 33 feet <br />deep contradicts the case closure summary attached to the SARWQCB No Further Action letter <br />for the Project site, which states that groundwater is at depths of 5.67 to 13 feet deep (as <br />excerpted in the below table). SWAPE, p. 3 (citing No Further Action Letter, attached hereto as <br />Exhibit D). <br />III. Release and Site Characterization Information <br />cause and type of release: unknown <br />Site characterization <br />Moderate to low concentration of <br />Date approved by agency <br />complete? <br />petroleum hydrocarbons were detected <br />in the soil and groundwater to the <br />south and southwest of the UST. The <br />affected soil and groundwater was not <br />defined to non -detect. <br />Monitoring wells <br />Yes <br />Number <br />11 <br />Proper screen <br />Yes <br />installed? <br />interval? <br />Deepest GW depth <br />13 feet <br />Shallowest GW depth <br />5.151 feet <br />Based on this data, SWAPE concludes that "if Project excavation is `a minimum of 5 feet <br />below the bottom of building foundations' (FEIR, p. 2-8), groundwater is likely to be <br />encountered if found at depths as shallow as 5.67 feet as stated by the SARWQCB in the table <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.