Laserfiche WebLink
The Warner Redhill Mixed -Use Project CEQA Findings of Fact <br />"Zone X," which is an area determined to be outside of the 0.2 percent annual chance flood. <br />Therefore, there is a low potential for onsite flooding to occur. <br />The Project would maintain the existing drainage pattern; and drainage would be <br />accommodated by onsite by Modular Wetland System units that have been sized to <br />accommodate the DAMP required design storm. Therefore, the Project would not result in <br />impeding or redirecting flood flows by the addition of the impervious surfaces. As detailed <br />previously, the City's permitting process would ensure that the drainage system specifications <br />adhere to the existing MS4 permit and DAMP regulations, and compliance with existing <br />regulations would ensure that impacts would be less than significant. <br />Plans, Program and Policies <br />PPP WO-1: NPDES/SWPPP. As listed previously. <br />PPP WO-2: WQMP. As listed previously. <br />Impact Finding; The Project would risk release of pollutants due to project inundation in a flood <br />hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, (Draft EIR at p. 5.8-18). <br />Fads in Support of Findings: The FEMA FIRM for the Project area (06059CO279J) shows that the <br />Project site is located within "Zone X," which is an area of minimal flood hazard potential outside <br />of the 0.2 percent annual chance flood. Thus, the Project site is not located within a flood hazard <br />area that could be inundated with flood flows and result in release of pollutants. Impacts related <br />to flood hazards and pollutants would not occur from the Project. <br />The Project site is over 8.5 miles from the Pacific Ocean, and outside of the Tsunami Hazard Zone <br />identified by the California Department of Conservation. Thus, the Project site would not be <br />inundated by a tsunami that could result in the release of pollutants, and impacts would not occur. <br />Additionally, because the Project site is not within the vicinity of a water body, it is not at risk for <br />seiche flood hazards. Therefore, the release of pollutants on the Project site resulting from a <br />seiche inundation would not occur <br />Impact Finding: The Project would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality <br />control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan (Draft EIR at p. 5.8-18). <br />Facts in Support of Findings: Use of BMPs during construction implemented as part of a SWPPP <br />as required by the NPDES Construction General Permit and PPP WQ-1 would serve to ensure that <br />Project impacts related to construction activities resulting in a degradation of water quality would <br />be less than significant. Thus, construction of the Project would not conflict or obstruct <br />implementation of a water quality control plan. <br />Also, development projects are required to implement a WQMP (per the Regional MS4 Permit) <br />that would comply with the Orange County DAMP. The WQMP and applicable BMPs are verified <br />as part of the City's permitting approval process, and construction plans would be required to <br />demonstrate compliance with these regulations. Therefore, operation of the proposed Project <br />would not conflict of obstruct with a water quality control plan. <br />In addition, as detailed previously, the OCWD manages basin water supply through the Basin <br />Production Percentage (BPP), such that, the anticipated production of groundwater would remain <br />City of Santa Ana 26 <br />May 2020 <br />