Laserfiche WebLink
12 <br />1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />THE COURT: Right. We discussed that back in <br />chambers, and we discussed the merits of raising that issue at <br />this juncture, given the verdict. And you -- <br />MR. RUBINER: And in discussing it with my client <br />and thinking about it, your Honor, I don't -- we spent a long <br />time working on this verdict form. And I think it was -- <br />THE COURT: Counsel, please don't tell me how long <br />you spent. Let's just get to the bottom line. This jury is <br />waiting. <br />MR. RUBINER: I think the jury should be asked to <br />answer Section 10. <br />MR. FELDMAN: We disagree because there's already <br />been a finding at Question 10 that there was a contract. <br />MR. SHORE: That Ryan Ogulnick agreed on behalf of <br />VDC at the Met -- <br />MR. FELDMAN: Ryan Ogulnick agreed on behalf of <br />VDC at the Met to enter into a contract. So because that was <br />answered yes, then there is no quantum meruit. <br />THE COURT: I agree. I'm going to decline <br />Mr. Rubiner's request. <br />Okay. So I'm going to leave on Line 18, Page 13, <br />proceed to Section 11. <br />And then the understanding is they are to go to <br />Section 11 and Section 12; is that correct? <br />MR. FELDMAN: Yes, your Honor. <br />MR. SHORE: Yes, your Honor. <br />MR. RUBINER: Yes, your Honor. <br />THE COURT: Any objection to that? <br />Coalition Court Reporters 1213.471.2966 1 www.ccrola.com <br />