My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - 11C
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2020
>
09/01/2020
>
CORRESPONDENCE - 11C
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/2/2020 8:50:50 AM
Creation date
9/1/2020 11:04:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
11C
Date
9/1/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Median Gross Rent in Santa Ana based on Year Built <br />3000 <br />2500 <br />2000 <br />1500 <br />1000 <br />500 <br />0 <br />�m4oy2 100 10y0 1":01 4A11 1°100 1°j00 ryO00 ti010 10�Pa <br />o" o" o" o" o" o" o" ca <br />19�9 10P 1�h 106 1p11 1,0 1(0 ry�OO ryQ1 010� <br />ti <br />(ACS 5V 2010 - 2C18 Estimates Table B25111) <br />HOO funds from these higher end units are the City of Santa Ana's primary means by which it <br />supports the building of affordable housing. In the coming months the Santa Ana Arts Collective <br />and Tiny Tim Plaza projects funded by HOO fees will be completed. We have no doubt that each <br />of the Council Members that voted to cut their source funding will also show up to cut the <br />ribbons on opening day. <br />Conclusion and Policy Recommendations <br />The City Council's dismantling of the HOO will provide an unnecessary giveaway to developers <br />while robbing itself of vital resources for affordable housing. Santa Ana is currently a hot real <br />estate market. The City Council should take advantage of Santa Ana's position in the market, <br />rather than squandering it, to strengthen its affordable housing stock while adding to housing <br />production. Otherwise, the City Council is exacerbating the displacement of their own residents <br />for no recognizable benefit. We recommend the following alternatives: <br />1. If the concern is truly about spurring construction during the pandemic, the proposed <br />fee reduction should be applied as a temporary administrative measure. This option is <br />already within the powers of the City Council to direct and approve without changing the <br />rest of the ordinance. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.