My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
65B - SERVICE FINANCIAL REPORT
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2020
>
09/15/2020
>
65B - SERVICE FINANCIAL REPORT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/10/2020 5:29:26 PM
Creation date
9/10/2020 5:15:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Parks, Recreation, & Community Services
Item #
65B
Date
9/15/2020
Destruction Year
2025
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Figure 7: Services Assessment Matrix <br />Where criteria intersect (in the <br />purple boxes) is the most logical <br />Service Provision Strategy <br />Q: Is the PRCSA the best or most appropriate organization to provide the service? <br />Q: Is market competition good for the citizenry? <br />Q: Is the PRCSA spreading its resources too thin without the capacity to sustain core services and <br />the system in general? <br />Q: Are there opportunities to work with another organization to provide services in a more <br />efficient and responsible manner? <br />THE SERVICES ASSESSMENT PROCESS <br />The Agency created a Service Menu listing each program, activity, or facility provided to the community. <br />The next step in the process was to gather data about each program and service provided and research <br />other providers of similar services in the market area for each service. This information was then used to <br />answer questions to determine the fit, financial capacity, market position, and alternative providers for <br />each service. This assessment allowed the determination of a recommended service provision strategy <br />for each service. <br />IDENTIFYING CORE SERVICES AND PROVISION STRATEGIES <br />The Services Assessment required Team Members to answer a series of questions regarding "fit" with <br />the mission and vision of the PRCSA; community need; the "strength of its market position" for each of <br />its services and programs; present credibility and capacity, and community awareness; the "financial <br />capacity" of the service or program to be viable without the support of tax funding; and the presence of <br />"alternative providers" in the market place. <br />32 Q 65B-36 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.