My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
60A - BACERRAS REQUEST
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2020
>
09/15/2020
>
60A - BACERRAS REQUEST
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/10/2020 5:31:51 PM
Creation date
9/10/2020 5:29:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
60A
Date
9/15/2020
Destruction Year
2025
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
vii. The other entities that have processed or commented on this <br />project have aviation safety duties and responsibilities related to <br />this matter. Each of these entities relies on or ultimately defers to <br />the FAA's authoritative aviation safety role in airspace <br />determinations. <br />viii. The AELUP for JWA, Section 2.1.3 Building Height Restrictions <br />states, "In adopting criteria for building height restrictions in the <br />vicinities of airports, the Commission considered only one <br />standard and that was Federal Aviation Regulations Part 77 ([14 <br />CFR] Part 77) entitled, Objects Affecting Navigable Airspace. <br />"These regulations are the only definitive standard available <br />[emphasis added] and the standard most generally used." <br />ix. Section 2.1.3 also recognizes FAA aeronautical studies beyond 14 <br />CFR Part 77 surfaces as the standard for review, "In addition to <br />the 'imaginary surfaces,' the Commission will use all of the FAR <br />Part 77.23 standards along with the results of FAA aeronautical <br />studies, [emphasis added] or other studies deemed necessary by <br />the Commission, in order to determine if a structure is an <br />'obstruction."' This section goes on to state: The Commission <br />considers and recognizes the FAA as the single "Authority" for <br />analyzing project impact on airport or aeronautical operations, or <br />navigational -aid siting, including interference with navigational - <br />aids or published flight paths and procedures. The Commission <br />also considers the FAA as the "Authority" for reporting the results <br />of such studies and project analyses. The Commission will not <br />consider the findings of reports or studies conducted by parties <br />other than the FAA unless the FAA certifies and adopts such <br />findings as true and correct. <br />X. Section 2.1.3 adds reference to FAA Advisory Circular 150/5190- <br />4A, A Model Zoning Ordinance to Limit Height of Objects Around <br />Airports for Commission Review. This FAA Advisory Circular <br />provides specific guidance for establishing zoning regulations <br />along with specific guidance on a "variance" process for potential <br />obstructions. At Section 3.b., 'The Federal Aviation Administration <br />(FAA) conducts aeronautical studies on obstructions which <br />examine their effect on such factors as: aircraft operational <br />capabilities; electronic and procedural requirements; and, airport <br />hazard standards. if an aeronautical study shows that an <br />obstruction, when evaluated against these factors, has no <br />substantial adverse effect upon the safe and efficient use of <br />navigable airspace, then the obstruction is considered not to <br />be a hazard to air navigation [emphasis added]." <br />Resolution No. 2020-067 <br />60A-1 0 Page 7 of 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.