My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
60A - BACERRAS REQUEST
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2020
>
09/15/2020
>
60A - BACERRAS REQUEST
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/10/2020 5:31:51 PM
Creation date
9/10/2020 5:29:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
60A
Date
9/15/2020
Destruction Year
2025
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
d. Safety. The residential and commercial land uses under the proposed <br />project are consistent with the safety standards of the AELUP. Project is <br />not in any of the AELUP safety zones. The project is located more than a <br />mile from the outer edge of AELUP Zone 6, Traffic Pattern Zone as <br />depicted in Appendix D. Further, AELUP Appendix D states the "Basic <br />Compatibility Qualities" of Zone 6 as "Allow residential uses" and "Allow <br />most nonresidential uses." <br />Project is not in the JWA runway protection zones (RPZ). The <br />Project is located nearly two miles from the outer edge of the <br />nearest JWA RPZ. <br />ii. The FAA's Determinations of No Hazard to Air Navigation for the <br />Mixed -Use development structures are the only source of <br />authoritative, aviation safety findings regarding the project. The <br />FAA conducted an aeronautical study (49 U.S.C. §44718 and 14 <br />CFR Part 77) and issued its Determinations on March 5, 2020 that <br />structures associated with the project "do not exceed standards <br />and would not be a hazard to air navigation" and that "[b]ased on <br />this evaluation, marking and lighting are not necessary for aviation <br />safety." The FAA's Determinations establish that the Project would <br />be neither an obstruction nor a hazard to air navigation. <br />iii. In this case it is important to first establish what entity has <br />authority over the use of airspace over the project site. "The <br />United States Government has exclusive sovereignty of airspace <br />of the United States" (49 U.S.C. § 40103(a)(1)). <br />iv. In order to use this airspace, the FAA Administrator is responsible <br />for: (1) Plans and policy for the safe use of the navigable airspace <br />(49 U.S.C. § 40103(b)(1); and (2) "[R]egulations on the flight of <br />aircraft (including regulations on safe altitudes) for navigating, <br />protecting and identifying aircraft; protecting individuals and <br />property on the ground; using the navigable airspace efficiently; <br />and preventing collision between aircraft, between aircraft and <br />land or water vehicle, and between aircraft and airborne objects' <br />(49 U.S.C. § 40103(b)(2)). <br />V. The FAA's aeronautical studies for the project structures are the <br />definitive standard for assessing compliance with federal aviation <br />safety laws and regulations (49 U.S.C. § 77.1(c)). This federal <br />authority is recognized in State law (Cal. PUC §21240). <br />vi. The City of Santa Ana has the local police powers to control land <br />use on the site (Cal. Const., art. XI 11, § 7). This constitutional <br />authority is acknowledged in State law (Cal. PUC §21670 and <br />§21676) and the ALUC process (AELUP §4.11) allowing for <br />overrule of an ALUC finding of inconsistency. <br />Resolution No. 2020-067 <br />Page 6 of 13 60A-9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.