60A - BACERRAS REQUEST - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Motion to Reconsider Previous Land Use Approval September 15, 2020 Page 2 3. If Resolution No. 2020-067 is not adopted by a 2/3 vote take no further action. 4. If the Motion for Reconsideration is not approved or Resolution No. 2020-067 is adopted by the necessary -2/3 vote, conduct the second reading of and adopt Ordinance No. NS-XXXX and approve the proposed Indemnification Agreement with Arrimus Capital. 4A. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVING AMENDMENT APPLICATION NO. 2020-01 REZONING THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2300, 2310, AND 2320 SOUTH REDHILL AVENUE FROM LIGHT INDUSTRIAL (M-1) TO SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT NO. 96 (SD-96) AND ADOPTING SD-96 FOR SAID PROPERTY 4B. Authorize the City Manager to execute an Indemnification Agreement with Arrimus Capital (Applicant) subject to non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney. DISCUSSION This matter has been placed on the agenda at Councilmember Bacerra's request for reconsideration of the City Council's approval of Resolution No. 2020-067 pertaining to the City Council making findings to overrule the Orange County Airport Land Use Commission's (ALUC) determination of inconsistency between the proposed Warner Redhill Mixed -Use Project and the Airport Environs Land Use Plan (AELUP) for John Wayne Airport. It is recommended that the City Council entertain a motion and a second, to reconsider Resolution No. 2020-067 from the August 18, 2020 City Council meeting. If the motion is passed the City Council may reopen discussion of Resolution No. 2020-67 which was a part of former Item No. 75C on August 18, 2020, and which is numbered as Item No. 60A on this agenda. The City Council voted to approve Item No.75C on August 18, 2020 by a vote of 5-2. Item No. 75C included several different actions and approvals. See Item No. 75C in its entirely at the link below: https://santaana.granicus.com/GeneratedAgendaViewer.php?view id=2&clip id=2964. Councilmember Bacerra voted to approve all items associated with agenda item No. 75C, including Resolution No. 2020-067 and has, subsequently asked at the immediate following meeting for reconsideration of the approval of said Resolution. The City Council has the authority, pursuant to rules of parliamentary procedure, to reconsider, renew, rescind or amend previous actions approved by the City Council. This is often referred to as reconsideration of an agenda item. A request to reconsider must be made at the same meeting at which the action was taken or the very next meeting. The request is then presented as a motion to reconsider which allows the City Council to revisit an item previously discussed and voted on. If the motion to reconsider passes, Resolution No. 2020-067 appears back before the City Council, 60A-2