Laserfiche WebLink
Motion to Reconsider Previous Land Use Approval <br />September 15, 2020 <br />Page 3 <br />as if it were on the floor for the first time, and a new motion to approve or deny said Resolution will <br />be in order. <br />If the motion to reconsider is approved, the City Council may then discuss, deliberate, and vote on <br />Resolution 2020-067 as it is now presented as new business Item No. 60A of this agenda. If <br />Resolution No. 2020-067 is not approved, the City Council will not need to take any further action. <br />If Resolution No. 2020-067 is approved, the City Council is asked to take two additional actions. <br />The first is to conduct the second reading of and adopt Ordinance No. NS-XXXX and the second <br />is to approve the proposed Indemnification Agreement with Arrimus Capital. The City Council <br />conducted the first reading of the ordinance on August 18, 2020. The proposed second reading <br />was on the agenda at the City Council's September 1, 2020 meeting, but was not considered <br />because of the request for reconsideration. <br />At the August 18, 2020 meeting Councilmember Bacerra asked about the impacts of the City <br />overruling the Airport Land Use Commission's finding of inconsistency between the proposed <br />project and the John Wayne Airport AELUP. At the time, the City Council was told that as a <br />consequence of overruling Airport Land Use Commission the Airport would be absolved of any <br />liability resulting from an airport or airline accident on the project property. The City Council was <br />informed that the developer, Arrimus Capital, had provided the City with an avigation easement <br />that fully indemnified and absolved the City from liability. The developer had not yet provided the <br />indemnification, but was required, as a condition of approval to do so in connection with the <br />required avigation easement. At this time, the developer has agreed to enter into a stand-alone <br />indemnification agreement to be recorded against the project property rather than include <br />indemnification language in the easement. The City Council is asked to approve the agreement, <br />which has been executed by the Applicant and attached hereto as Exhibit 3. <br />FISCAL IMPACT <br />There is no fiscal impact associated with approval of this action. <br />Submitted by: Minh Thai, Executive Director/Planning and Building Agency <br />Exhibits: 1. Resolution No. 2020-067 <br />2. Ordinance NS-XXXX <br />3. Indemnification Agreement <br />4. August 18, 2020 City Council meeting Staff Report Item No. 75C can be view it <br />its entirety at the link below: <br />https://santaana.qranicus.com/GeneratedAgendaViewer.php?view id=2&clip id=296 <br />4 <br />60A-3 <br />