Laserfiche WebLink
Resolution No. 2020-30 <br />Page 4 of 8 <br />enhance the City’s economic and fiscal viability, to preserve <br />and improve the character and integrity of existing <br />neighborhoods and to protect and enhance development <br />sites and districts which are unique community assets that <br />enhance the quality of life. Redevelopment of the super <br />block into two development sites with a new sidewalk and <br />street grid will link the existing Artist Village and west-end <br />commercial uses with the rest of Downtown to help activate <br />the area. The development will rehabilitate a property that is <br />underutilized and will increase capital investment. <br />Section 2. The Applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold the City <br />and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, <br />authorized volunteers, and instrumentalities thereof, harmless from any and all <br />claims, demands, lawsuits, writs of mandamus, and other and proceedings (whether <br />legal, equitable, declaratory, admi nistrative or adjudicatory in nature), and alternative <br />dispute resolution procedures (including, but not limited to arbitrations, mediations, <br />and such other procedures), judgments, orders, and decisions (collectively “Actions”), <br />brought against the City an d/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, <br />departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof, that challenge, attack, or seek <br />to modify, set aside, void, or annul, any action of, or any permit or approval issued by <br />the City and/or any of it s officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, <br />agencies, and instrumentalities thereof (including actions approved by the voters of <br />the City) for or concerning the project, whether such Actions are brought under the <br />Ralph M. Brown Act, California E nvironmental Quality Act, the Planning and Zoning <br />Law, the Subdivision Map Act, Code of Civil Procedure sections 1085 or 1094.5, or <br />any other federal, state or local constitution, statute, law, ordinance, charter, rule, <br />regulation, or any decision of a cou rt of competent jurisdiction. It is expressly agreed <br />that the City shall have the right to approve, which approval will not be unreasonably <br />withheld, the legal counsel providing the City’s defense, and that Applicant shall <br />reimburse the City for any costs and expenses directly and necessarily incurred by <br />the City in the course of the defense. City shall promptly notify the Applicant of any <br />Action brought and City shall cooperate with Applican t in the defense of the Action. <br />Section 3. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act <br />(CEQA), the Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines, <br />and declares as follows: <br />Based on the substantial evidence set forth in the record, including but not <br />limited to the 2010 EIR and the 2020 Third and Broadway Addendum, the <br />Planning Commission finds that an addendum is the appropriate document for <br />disclosing the changes to the subject properties, and that none of the conditions <br />identified in Public Resources Code section 21166 and State CEQA Guidelines <br />section 15162 requiring subsequent environmental review have occurred, <br />because: