Laserfiche WebLink
Resolution No. 2020-30 <br />Page 5 of 8 <br />A. The project does not constitute a substantial change that would <br />require major revisions of the 2010 EIR due to the involvement of <br />new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in <br />the severity of previously identified significant effects. <br />B. There is not a substantial change with respect to the circumstances <br />under which the project will be developed that would require major <br />revisions of the 2010 EIR due to the involvement of new significant <br />environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of the <br />previously identified significant effects. <br />C. New information of substantial importance has not been presented <br />that was not known and could not have been known with the <br />exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the 2010 EIR was <br />certified or adopted, showing any of the following: (i) that the <br />modifications would have one or more significant effects not <br />discussed in the earlier environmental documentation; (ii) that <br />significant effects previously examined would be substantially more <br />severe than shown in the earlier environmental documentation; (iii) <br />that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be <br />feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce <br />one or more significant effects, but the applicant declined to adopt <br />such measures; or (iv) that mitigation measures or alternatives <br />considerably different from those analyzed previously would <br />substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the <br />environment, but which the applicant declined to adopt. <br />Section 4. The Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana, after conducting the <br />public hearing, hereby approves Variance No. 2020-05 as conditioned in “Exhibit A” <br />attached hereto and incorporated as though fully set forth herein. This decision is based <br />upon the evidence submitted at the above said hearing, which includes, but is not limited <br />to: the Request for Planning Commission Action dated September 28, 2020, and exhibits <br />attached thereto; and the public testimony, written and oral, all of which are incorporated <br />herein by this reference. <br />Section 5. Variance No. 2020-05 shall not be effective until the City Council reviews <br />and approves the Addendum, Environmental Review No. 2019-85, Density Bonus <br />Application No. 2020-01, Site Plan Review No. 2020-01, Site Plan Review No. 2020-02 <br />and the Disposition and Development Agreement for the subject project. If said approvals <br />are held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent <br />jurisdiction, or otherwise denied, then this variance shall be null and void and have no <br />further force and effect.