My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3 - The Bowery_PUBLIC COMMENT_RAMSEY
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
Planning Commission (2002-Present)
>
2020
>
05-11-20
>
3 - The Bowery_PUBLIC COMMENT_RAMSEY
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/9/2020 10:02:45 PM
Creation date
11/9/2020 10:00:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PBA
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
488
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5.0 Environmental Analysis 5.1 Land Use <br />Avion Project SEIR <br />Page 5.1-11 <br />Belding’s Orange-throated Whiptail <br />The area-specific management directives (ASMDs) for Belding’s orange-throated whiptail must <br />address edge effects. <br />• To address edge effects, the entire development footprint shall be located outside of the <br />MHPA. Manufactured slopes adjacent to the MHPA would be steep and relatively high to <br />minimize potential edge effects and prevent encroachment into the MHPA. These slopes <br />would be revegetated with native species. <br />Cooper’s Hawk <br />The ASMDs for Cooper’s hawk include a 300-foot impact avoidance area around active nests, and <br />minimization of disturbance in oak woodlands and oak riparian forests. <br />• Should an active Cooper’s hawk, or raptor nest, be detected within the MHPA during the pre- <br />grading survey, discussed in Section 7.2.1, appropriate construction setback of 300 feet will <br />be implemented until the fledglings are independent of the nest. <br />Coastal California Gnatcatcher <br />For coastal California gnatcatchers, the ASMDs must include additional measures to reduce edge <br />effects and minimize disturbance during the nesting period, fire protection measures to reduce the <br />potential for habitat degradation due to unplanned fire, and management measures to maintain or <br />improve habitat quality including vegetation structure. No clearing of occupied habitat within the <br />City of San Diego’s MHPAs may occur during this species’ breeding season between March 1 and <br />August 15. <br />• The entire development footprint is outside of the MHPA. The manufactured slopes adjacent <br />to the MHPA would be steep, relatively high, and revegetated with native species; therefore, <br />the proposed project should not increase edge effects in the MHPA. A buffer occurs between <br />the development footprint and the MHPA which should help protect from accidental fires <br />spreading into the MHPA from the proposed project. As stated in the MHPA Adjacency <br />Guidelines under Brush Management, vegetation clearing will be done consistent with City of <br />San Diego standards and will avoid/minimize impacts to species such as the coastal <br />California gnatcatcher. <br />Southern California Rufous-crowned Sparrow <br />For this species, the management directive includes maintenance of dynamic processes, such a fire, <br />to perpetuate some open phases of coastal sage scrub with herbaceous components. <br />• The project would not alter the current dynamic processes, such as fire, as a buffer is <br />provided between the development footprint and the MHPA which should help protect from <br />accidental fires spreading into the MHPA from the proposed project.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.