3 - The Bowery_PUBLIC COMMENT_RAMSEY

Home Browse Search

5.0 Environmental Analysis 5.2 Biological Resources Avion Project SEIR Page 5.2-17 5.2.5.1 Threshold(s) In accordance with the City’s Significance Determination Thresholds and LDC Biology Guidelines, the project would have a significant impact if it would: • Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, including linkages identified in the MSCP Plan, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites. 5.2.5.2 Impacts Minor local restrictions to wildlife would occur with the project. However, wildlife movement from a regional perspective would not be adversely disrupted by the project, as connections to large areas of native habitat would remain functional and in conformance with the Subarea Plan objectives for regional wildlife movement (see Figure 5.2-2). 5.2.5.3 Significance of Impacts Impacts to wildlife movement would be less than significant. 5.2.5.4 Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting No mitigation is required. 5.2.6 Issues 5 and 6: MSCP/MHPA Conflicts • Would the proposal conflict with the provisions of an adopted HCP, NCCP or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan, either within the MSCP plan area or in the surrounding region? • Would the proposal introduce a land use within an area adjacent to the MHPA that would result in adverse edge effects? 5.2.6.1 Threshold(s) In accordance with the City’s Significance Determination Thresholds, a project would have a significant impact if it would: • Result in a conflict with the provisions of an adopted HCP, NCCP, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan, either within the MSCP plan area or in the surrounding region; and/or • Introduce land use within an area adjacent to the MHPA that would result in adverse edge effects.