My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
25B - AGMT FOR OPEN MASTER PLAN
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2020
>
12/01/2020
>
25B - AGMT FOR OPEN MASTER PLAN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/25/2020 12:14:27 PM
Creation date
11/25/2020 12:06:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Parks, Recreation, & Community Services
Item #
25B
Date
12/1/2020
Destruction Year
2025
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Exhibit 1 <br />IV. PROPOSAL REVIEW (CONSULTANT SELECTION) <br />A. EVALUATION AND RATING <br />The CITY has established a proposal review committee to evaluate proposals based on <br />the response to the RFP, which includes adherence to outlined directions and format, and <br />the CITY evaluation criteria set forth above. A final score will be calculated for each <br />submitted proposal and used to rank the PROPOSERS. <br />The criteria for evaluating the proposals submitted will take the following items into <br />consideration: <br />• Firm/Team Experience 25% <br />• Relevant Project Experience 25% <br />• References 10% <br />• Scope of Work/Understanding of Need 25% <br />• Schedule 10% <br />• Fee 5% <br />The CITY reserves the right to request clarification and/or request additional information <br />from PROPOSERS, if necessary. Such clarifications and/or additional information shall <br />be submitted by the PROPOSERS as an Addendum to the Proposal upon request of the <br />Contract Officer. However, since PROPOSERS may not request to provide additional <br />input, PROPOSERS are advised to submit complete information in the Proposal. <br />Based on the evaluation results, the City may hold interviews and finalists may be asked <br />to participate in an interview session and/or supplemental questionnaire. Exact date and <br />time will be provided to the finalist(s) seven days prior to the assigned interview session <br />and/or due date of the supplemental questionnaire. If an interview session and/or <br />supplemental questionnaire is performed, the results will be added to the initial evaluation <br />score to determine the selected company. <br />B. SELECTION <br />The CITY will recommend award of the agreement to the PROPOSER who will provide <br />the best quality and value to the CITY. CITY reserves the right to negotiate the final terms <br />of the agreement. CITY reserves the right to begin negotiations and enter into an <br />agreement without interview or further discussions. PROPOSER will be asked to sign a <br />tentative agreement that will be subject the City final approval. If in the negotiation <br />process, the CITY and PROPOSER cannot agree on final terms, the City reserves the <br />right to begin negotiations another proposer or reject all proposals. <br />V. AWARD OF AGREEMENT <br />A. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />Following evaluation and rating by the proposal review committee, the Executive Director <br />will recommend award of an agreement to the PROPOSER providing the best quality and <br />value to the CITY. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.