Laserfiche WebLink
when step -backs are required on upper levels. Moreover, an <br />increase in the allowable maximum ratio would avoid a two - <br />block development where one block looks arbitrarily carved <br />down by a forced stepback and avoid an incompatible <br />design that could cause an unbalanced composition of <br />massing along Fourth Street, inconsistent with the <br />architectural vernacular and intentions of the Transit Zoning <br />Code. <br />3. That the granting of a variance will not be materially detrimental to <br />the public welfare or injurious to surrounding property. <br />The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the <br />public or surrounding properties. A shade and shadow <br />analysis was conducted for the proposed project. The Site <br />Shadow Study indicates that none of the sensitive uses <br />surrounding the project sites would be shaded by either <br />building for more than three hours between 9:00 A.M. and <br />3:00 P.M. during the Winter Solstice. Likewise, sensitive land <br />uses would not be shaded by project structures for more <br />than five hours between 9:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. during the <br />summer. As such, the proposed project would not result in a <br />new significant impact or substantially increase the severity <br />of a previously identified significant impact with respect to <br />shade and shadow beyond those analyzed in the 2010 ElR. <br />Moreover, the adjacent automotive repair and commercial <br />space on Site B offers collective massing relief for the site. <br />Although not part of the project, this parcel's size means that <br />if redeveloped, it will always be to a lower building and <br />massing scale than the proposed five -story structure on Site <br />B. When viewed collectively, the amount of "stepback" or <br />reduction in floor volume would exceed the required 85% of <br />ground floor requirement and would be roughly comparable <br />to the third floor stepback accomplished by the courtyard on <br />Site A. Further, the Citywide Design Guidelines encourage <br />new buildings to be compatible with surrounding character, <br />including building style, form, size, materials, and roofline. <br />Specifically, Chapter 8 (Downtown Development <br />Guidelines), Section 8.6 encourages that the height and <br />scale of new buildings complement existing structures and <br />provide a sense of human scale and proportion. As the two <br />blocks are being developed together they're designed with <br />appropriate congruity and diversity in both style and <br />articulation. Both buildings rise with balanced "U-shaped" <br />courtyard design facing Fourth Street and vary significantly <br />with a two-story height variation. A two -block development <br />I1=11 MO, Orew-NO18bT <br />75C-367 <br />