Laserfiche WebLink
F. On October 12, 2020, the Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana <br />held a duly noticed public hearing regarding Variance No. 2020-06 and at <br />that time considered all testimony, written and oral. <br />G. The Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana has considered the <br />information and determines that following findings, which must be <br />established in order to grant Variance No. 2020-06, have been established <br />as required by SAMC Section 41-638: <br />That because of special circumstances applicable to the subject <br />property, including size, shape, topography, location or <br />surroundings, the strict application of the zoning ordinance is found <br />to deprive the subject property of privileges not otherwise at <br />variance with the intent and purpose of the provisions of this <br />Chapter. <br />The project site has a special circumstance related to its <br />existing shape and location. Site B has a smaller than <br />average lot depth and lot width, compared to most lots in the <br />downtown area. Lots in the downtown area average 250 feet <br />by 250 feet. While portions of Site B meet the average lot <br />width and depth, a majority of Site B is smaller -than - <br />average. Site A takes advantage of a full city block with <br />complete street frontages along every street while Site B is <br />interrupted by an adjacent parcel not part of the project, and <br />approximately 6,200 square feet in size, or 50 feet by 124 <br />feet. This results in Site B having smaller -than -average <br />street frontages along Mortimer and Fourth Streets. Without <br />the increase in the allowable building size and massing <br />standards, the project would need to be redesigned, <br />resulting in several impacts to the feasibility of the site's <br />development. These impacts would include a loss off-street <br />parking spaces by requiring a reduction in size of the parking <br />structure; an incompatible design and unbalanced <br />composition of massing the project site; and/or a smaller <br />building footprint that would reduce the building's interior <br />floor area and individual unit sizes. <br />2. That the granting of a variance is necessary for the preservation <br />and enjoyment of one (1) or more substantial property rights. <br />Granting this variance is necessary for the preservation and <br />enjoyment of substantial property rights. An increase in the <br />allowable maximum ratio would allow for a design that takes <br />into account Downtown Santa Ana's smaller -than -average <br />lot depths as well as the interruption of the adjacent parcel, <br />account for engineering and design challenges of buildings <br />I1=11riG71 ►rew- MIST <br />75C-366 <br />