Laserfiche WebLink
EXHIBIT A: SCOPE OF WORK <br />MIG proposes a four -phased planning project that corresponds to the tasks noted in the RFP: <br />➢ Phase 1:Inventory and Analyze <br />➢ Phase 2: Evaluate and Forecast <br />➢ Phase 3: Propose and Prioritize <br />➢ Phase 4: Plan and Adopt <br />Phase 1: Inventory and Analyze <br />1.1 PROJECT KICKOFF VIDEOCONFERENCE <br />MIG will meet with the City's Project Manager and Leadership Team in a one -hour videoconference to initiate the <br />project and discuss the desired project outcomes, available background materials, communication protocols, <br />engagement strategies, and schedule. MIG will host the call on Zoom and provide an agenda. <br />1.2 BACKGROUND INFORMATION REVIEW <br />MIG will submit an information request letter and create a shared drive with links for City use in uploading relevant <br />project information. Information includes but is not limited to GIS data, existing inventories, initiatives and programs, <br />site master plans, relevant reports and documents, recreation participation data, capital projects lists, maintenance <br />data and frequencies, and policy directions relevant to the Master Plan. MIG has allotted time to download data and <br />take a cursory look at materials to know where to incorporate information into other tasks. <br />1.3 PROJECT BRANDING AND ENGAGEMENT STRATEGY <br />MIG will prepare a public engagement and outreach strategy memo, identifying target audiences and key partners to <br />engage in the Master Plan process, defining how public engagement techniques and notification strategies will be <br />deployed, discussing bilingual meeting and translation needs, and clarifying roles and responsibilities. As part of this <br />task, the MIG graphics team will develop one draft document banner (using City -provided photos) and a Word <br />document template. MIG will revise these materials based on one round of consolidated comments. The final banner <br />will give to give project materials a recognizable visual identity. <br />1.4 PARKS AND FACILITY INVENTORY AND GIS BASE MAP <br />MIG will cross-check inventory data provided by the City against GIS parks data and park tour notes to create an Excel <br />spreadsheet accounting of City park sites, park acreage and major recreation facilities. (Amenities such as tables, <br />benches, trash receptacles, parking spaces, etc. are not counted.) Using GIS data provided by the City, we will produce <br />one draft citywide base map (11" x17") showing existing City parks, open space, major recreation facilities, and trails in <br />and Santa Ana on an overlay of information including City planning areas, water bodies, roadways, and schools. The <br />draft inventory and base map will be revised into final form based on one round of consolidated comments from the <br />City. <br />1.5 PARKS AND FACILITY TOUR <br />MIG will spend four hours touring representative parks, recreation facilities, trails, and public spaces accompanied by <br />City parks, recreation, and maintenance staff. The tour will provide an opportunity to discuss the strengths and <br />challenges of the park system at representative sites and discuss issues such as operations, opportunities, planned <br />partnerships, development or improvements, and maintenance. The City will schedule and coordinate the site tour, <br />ensuring that staff are available to answer questions. <br />Following the tour, MIG will refine and share MIG's Park Evaluation and Assessment Checklist for City staff to use in <br />rating parks --as an efficient way to share staff knowledge of park condition issues and concerns, providing one <br />consolidated set of data to MIG. MIG will facilitate a one -hour videoconference meeting with park development and <br />maintenance staff to discuss their preliminary scores for park and facility condition, access, safety, and enhancement <br />capacity. Following this meeting, one MIG staff will spend 4 days in the field visiting targeted City parks to cross-check <br />staff ratings of Athletic Facilities, Outdoor Recreation Elements, Specialized Facilities, Park Support Amenities, and <br />Landscaping. The final scores will be used to inform the Task 1.9 deliverable and subsequent recommendations. (Note: <br />This task does not include an architectural evaluation of indoor facilities, buildings, or Zoo elements.) <br />