Laserfiche WebLink
STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS <br />UNDERSTANDING OF NEED <br />c. The Encampments — Designing an overlook deck that <br />won't be susceptible to the homeless encampments that overrun <br />the original construction will require some no-nonsense design <br />work to fend off future attempts to utilize the underside of the <br />overlook deck as a living area. Clearly the original chain link fabric <br />wasn't a sturdy enough material to hold up against the motivated <br />persons attempting to access these areas below the deck. <br />We think the best solution is to look at a rigid fence type design <br />utilizing heavy gauge posts, rails, and pickets is the surest way to <br />secure the area below the deck. We can also deter people from <br />wanting to access that area with the use of motion activated spot <br />lights and large rubble and boulders on the ground, making it an <br />uncomfortable place to be day or night. <br />d. The Site Lighting — We think the site lighting could be <br />a critical component in the future success of this site as a rest <br />stop for the bike trail. It will make it safer and more inviting for <br />those using the trails after dark to stop, catch their breath and <br />enjoy the evening view. It appears the big challenge will be <br />providing power to any proposed lighting. The as-builts didn't <br />include any electrical plans and the proposed irrigation controller <br />was a solar powered model so we're suspect that there will be <br />existing power available for lighting to this site. Our design team <br />Will help determine the best options based on what's available. <br />The easiest solution would be if we have an existing power pole <br />close -by where we can establish a pole mounted transformer <br />and run power from there, otherwise we'll work with the utility <br />company to determine where power is available and what will <br />be required to establish a new service feed and meter pedestal <br />with a panel onsite. It will be critical to make this determination <br />as quickly as possible as we'll need to start coordination with the <br />utility company immediately. This will be a key critical path item. <br />We'll also need to understand what are the City Standards for <br />lighting in terms of fixture selection and color temperature for a <br />park site such as this? <br />e. Planting and Irrigation —We have a number of tasks to <br />perform onsiteto understand better howto approach the landscape <br />design. We'll need to walk the site with the maintenance staff <br />and operate the existing system to make sure we're still getting <br />head -to -head coverage and identify any gaps. The planting is a <br />trickier issue to resolve. Looking at the as -built planting plan that <br />was provided, the tree species that were proposed are suitable <br />for a riparian landscape but only a few of the shrubs on the as - <br />built list would be considered "riparian" (ex. Mahonia and Ribes). <br />Based on what we observed onsite, what has established <br />onsite and where the bare areas are, it appears most of the <br />shrubs that were planted with the original construction did <br />not survive and the existing shrubs that have established <br />were part of the original hydroseed that was put down. <br />The as-builts also called out for the existing landscape slope <br />along the bike path to be protected -in -place but this landscape <br />has not survived either and will need to be reestablished as part <br />of this project. We believe that many of the trees and some of <br />the existing shrub material that has established can be salvaged <br />for this redevelopment of the site and be part of a successful <br />riparian strategy. The bigger challenge we see with the existing <br />landscape is to screen off the adjacent property to the south and <br />east. That property is currently owned and operated by Ferrell <br />gas and is comprised of an open asphalt parking area with large <br />trucks and propane tanks. We want to see that entire edge of the <br />property be planted with medium to larger size shrubs and small <br />trees so that a dense visual buffer can be established, blocking <br />this view and create a more wooded feel once established. <br />iv. Preliminary Design Development Package — <br />After our kick-off meeting but before jumping into construction <br />documents we propose a fast -paced design phase to hash out <br />some of the issues discussed above and resolve some of the <br />questions raised thru our due diligence process. The layout of the <br />site and the design of the deck are pretty much set but we feel a <br />quick DD phase will be beneficial to the City. It gives our design <br />team an opportunity to present ideas to the City regarding different <br />areas of scope such as: <br />deck framing and detailing <br />possible light fixtures and how to mount them <br />reusing existing site furnishings VS new benches and trash <br />project signage locations and content <br />existing planting to remain <br />133 CITY OF SANTA ANA: REP NO.30-130 <br />11TM STREET TRIANGULAR PARK RESTORATION <br />