Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Verny Carvajal <br />October 6, 2020 <br />Page 5 <br /> <br /> <br />Willowick site to be developed into approximately 270 affordable housing units. See <br />Willowick Community Park Proposal at 30. <br /> <br />The Willowick development by itself would not be sufficient to meet the City’s <br />affordable housing needs—the Update must provide for increased affordable housing <br />development citywide. However, the Update fails to provide for sufficient housing at the <br />affordability levels the City needs, and its upzonings would instead undermine the <br />effectiveness of the city’s Housing Opportunity Ordinance. The Update would increase <br />residential density limits in many areas of Santa Ana. It would modify land use <br />designations in five Focus Areas (South Main Street Focus Area, Grand Avenue & 17th <br />Street, West Santa Ana Boulevard, 55 Freeway & Dyer Road, and South Bristol Street), <br />re-designating portions of those areas for more intensive development and increasing the <br />allowable dwellings per acre and floor-area ratio for residential construction in those <br />areas. DPEIR at 1-6, 1-7, H-a-7. The Update would also add a “Corridor Residential” <br />land use designation, which would allow higher density residential development in <br />additional areas. DPEIR at 3-52. These upzonings will facilitate increased housing <br />construction, but would also undermine the HOO’s inclusionary housing requirements. <br /> <br />The HOO requires developers to construct affordable units or pay a fee when the <br />number of residential units in a new development exceeds the density permitted by <br />applicable zoning. Santa Ana Muni. Code § 41-1902. Development projects are not <br />subject to the HOO’s inclusionary requirements if they do not exceed established density <br />limits under the zoning for the site. Id. <br /> <br />Because the Update would increase density limits in many areas of the City and <br />allow more by-right development, fewer developments will need to seek City approval <br />for additional density. In many, if not most, cases the HOO’s inclusionary requirements <br />will be triggered less often. As a result, the HOO will apply to fewer projects. Developers <br />will build fewer affordable units and pay less into the City’s inclusionary housing fund. <br />By reducing the effectiveness of the HOO, the Update would also undermine General <br />Plan Housing Element Policy 2.6, which provides that “pursuant to the Housing <br />Opportunity Ordinance,” the City must “require eligible rental and ownership housing <br />projects to include at least 15 percent of the housing units as affordable for lower and <br />moderate-income households.” DPEIR at 5.10-17. <br /> <br />The Update will thus create an internal inconsistency within the General Plan, as <br />the increased by-right densities will impede achievement of the Housing Element’s goal. <br />To avoid this illegal inconsistency, the City must, within or simultaneous with the <br />Update, revise the HOO to ensure sufficient affordable housing production. Gov. Code §