My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Packet_10-20-21
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
Zoning Administrator (2009-Present)
>
2021
>
10.20.21
>
Packet_10-20-21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/25/2021 3:20:06 PM
Creation date
10/25/2021 3:19:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PBA
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Minor Exception No. 2021-02 – Chilly Willy Desserts Front Yard Fence <br />October 20, 2021 <br />Page 3 <br />1 <br />8 <br />7 <br />1 <br />improvement plans for upgrades the existing equipment, which were finalized in July <br />2021. <br />Project Analysis <br />Pursuant to SAMC 41-610(a)(1), front yard fences on properties along arterial streets zoned <br />for residential and commercial use such as Fourth Street, are limited to four feet in height. <br />The applicant has filed an application to construct a seven-foot high (maximum height) front <br />yard fence at the subject property. Staff has reviewed the applicant’s request and is <br />supportive of the minor exception to allow the installation of proposed fencing, as it will <br />enhance property use, reduce illegal access to the site, and provide a safe working- <br />environment. <br />The site has operated as an industrial use since the original date of construction. In 2010, <br />the City adopted SD-84, known as the Transit Zoning Code and applied an Urban <br />Neighborhood 2 subzone to the property. This change in zoning district created a non- <br />conforming use on the property as industrial uses, as light manufacturing would require <br />approval of a conditional use permit. Even in 2002, when the building suffered damages <br />from a fire and the zoning district was General Commercial (C-2) and the use was legal <br />non-conforming. Through Section 41-682 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC), the <br />owner was given permits to reconstruct the building and continue the manufacturing use. <br />Furthermore, the applicant has provided examples of neighboring properties that currently <br />have fences in the front yard exceeding the four-foot height limit (Exhibit 5). These nearby <br />locations also have industrial type uses on-site. Allowing the fence to exceed the four- <br />foot height will not impact the nearby properties, as it will assimilate aesthetically with the <br />properties along 4th Street. <br />The purpose of the proposed fence is to prevent trespassing, reduce vandalism and burglary <br />incidents. The property has been broken into three times since the new business moved in <br />in 2020. Since the operation of the business is small, with two or three employees at any <br />given time, safety concerns for employees have escalated with the break-ins. Therefore, to <br />provide a secure environment for all employees, the applicant is requesting to install a fence <br />to secure the project site. <br />Moreover, the project is consistent with the General Plan Goal 2.0 of the Urban Design <br />Element, which states that developments should be proportionally and aesthetically related <br />to its district setting. Additionally, Goal 2.7 of the Urban Design Element states that projects <br />must exhibit a functional, comfortable scale in relation to the neighborhood. This proposed <br />seven-foot tall fence is in scale with existing fencing and structures in the project site’s <br />vicinity, including the immediately adjacent property to the west that has a concrete block <br />wall over four-feet in height at the property line. Staff is supportive of the applicant’s request <br />for the proposed fencing improvements.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.