UNIVERSITY OF CALIFONIA IRVINE - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Latino -serving and two AAPI-serving) during its monthly Leadership Task Force meetings. With guidance and funding from HEAL-OC, HLWG members will develop and implement a Health Literacy Surveillance and Intervention Plan (Figure 1; Outcomes 4 & 5). upillijlillllllluu�ruplirUll�iu��,;,�w" I"IIII �Im�lm1��1�Ur�1J� i��lml I � � � mll��y,1�IfUa1»dJ19'1i'1�r,1„';L'��a IIIII�� �� I ,,, „1� ,,,„ 1 Convene Health Literacy Working Group with at least 4 CHC Developclinic-based Phased implementation of members, guided by CHC Track Coordinator at the Coalition interventions, including provider and patient -focused p p interventions, first at 2 CHCs followed by 2 more CHCs after 3 months to Broader education, following ODPHP serve as "waitlist controls" for dissemination Use existing validated National Framework for comparative evaluation of impact. of questionnaire measures of HP2030 Health Literacy Objectives Health Literacy and CDC Making Health Literacy Real Analyze gap reductions in HP2030 interventions to other CHC HC/HIT-01, 02 & 03, following workbook. measures at CHCs vs. national targets members National CLAS Standards, in clinic sites to establish baseline & Continue adding Working Continue adding Working Group g g P member CHCs ongoing surveillance. Group member CHCs �� IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII(I(II �� I J 1 III � � �� /��ii�l1'ii9 �7777r�7711J11 ��I !`,1 PP,P n � r �'V��111iiy��r��VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV��Vi'�" ��6��VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVI Figure 1. CHC Track Health Literacy Surveillance & Intervention Plan overview As of August 2021, the PH and CHC Track members are submitting their preliminary HLP to OMH for review and feedback, and are simultaneously refining it to ensure adherence with CLAS Standards and to include input from the Community Stewards Board and the UCI Technical Advisory group. They expect to finalize the plan by October. Part 3. Logic Mod&II [YaiiliilaII°ive Although the PH and CHC Tracks will interact and support each other, we have developed separate logic models for main focus of each track. The first logic model (Table 1a) guides the evaluation of the PH Track, with a focus on COVID-19 service access, utilization and outcomes (Outcome 3), including HP2030 indicator IID-D02. The second logic model (Table 1b) focuses on the activities and outcomes of the Community Health Center Track, emphasizing a process to engage two cohorts of CHCs (four CHCs total) to conduct a current state assessment of HP2030 Health Literacy metrics and CLAS Standard adherence, set targets for gap reductions in those indicators and select existing evidence -based interventions to implement, phased implementation of interventions across 2 cohorts for robust causal analysis of intervention effects on outcomes and preparation of a "Health Literacy Playbook" for dissemination to the remaining CHC members of the Coalition.