My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - #16
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2022
>
02/01/2022 Special and Regular & HA
>
CORRESPONDENCE - #16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/2/2022 1:31:26 PM
Creation date
2/1/2022 10:38:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Date
2/1/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 2 <br /> interest that share an ethnic background,race did not predominate in the drawing of any map. Instead,the <br /> SARC considered race as one of many factors. Other factors the SARC considered include compactness, <br /> contiguity, and easily identifiable lines. The SARC also considered socioeconomic factors and shared <br /> interests and concerns,including environmental justice issues,the prevalence of mobile home parks, and <br /> income levels throughout the City. <br /> The SARC maps comply with the Fair Maps Act's mandatory ranked redistricting criteria.Both <br /> maps contain districts that are geographically contiguous. See Cal. Elec. Code § 21621(c)(1). The maps <br /> also maintain several communities of interest. See id. § 21621(c)(2). Districts A,B,D, and F share largely <br /> the same configuration in both maps and maintain distinct communities of interest.As discussed in <br /> greater detail in the SARC map narratives, each of these communities have a series of interests and <br /> concerns largely unique to them. Characteristics include,to name a few, a high number of mobile home <br /> parks and shared restaurants and faith institutions in District A,more affluent and historic neighborhoods <br /> in District B, a high number of mobile home parks and shared environmental justice concerns in District <br /> D, and low-income,mixed immigration status households facing environmental justice issues in District <br /> F. District F also keeps the Delhi neighborhood intact. There is a larger community of interest in the <br /> southern core of the city that includes low-income,working-class, and mixed immigration status <br /> households. In both configurations,these communities are captured by Districts E and C. The <br /> northernmost part of this region,however,is also heavily impacted by environmental justice concerns. <br /> This region is captured by District E in SARC Map I and by District C in SARC Map 2.Finally,both <br /> map configurations create compact districts with borders that include major streets and landmarks and <br /> will therefore be easily identifiable by residents. See id. § 21621(c)(2)-(3). <br /> The Fair Maps Act and federal redistricting laws seek to ensure that maps are representative of <br /> various communities within a jurisdiction. The SARC maps do precisely this. Through months of <br /> community outreach and review of socioeconomic and environmental data,the SARC created two maps <br /> that capture various communities of interest throughout the City, ensuring that all residents have an <br /> opportunity to elect candidates of their choice. We urge you to adopt either SARC Map I or SARC Map <br /> 2. If you have any questions or concerns,you can reach us at cvalencia&aclusocal.org or <br /> jg omezgaclusocal.org <br /> Julia A. Gomez Cynthia Valencia <br /> Staff Attorney Senior Policy Advocate and Organizer <br /> ACLU Foundation of Southern California ACLU Foundation of Southern California <br /> AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.