Laserfiche WebLink
recirculation period that relate to the chapter of the earlier EIT that were revised and <br />recirculated. <br />APPROACH <br />The scope of work Included in this proposal assumes that the City will only recirculate limited chapters of the EIR that <br />require updating. The advantage of only recirculating some chapters, Is that new comments are limited to only those <br />chapters. We propose revising and recirculating the following EIR chapters: <br />» Executive Summary <br />» Project Description <br />» Air Quality <br />» Hazards <br />» Recreation <br />» Alternatives <br />As we have discussed with the City, we anticipated that Recreation/Open Space would be determined to be a <br />significant impact under the recirculated Draft PEIR. This new Impact will likely merit new mitigation measures and/or <br />a new project alternative to focused on reducing impacts to recreation. <br />This approach would not allow any new comments on the following chapters which would not be recirculated: <br />rr Aesthetics <br />» Biological Resources <br />» Cultural Resources <br />a Energy <br />» Geotechnlcal <br />» GI-IG <br />» Hydrology/WaterQuality <br />» Mineral <br />» Noise <br />» Public Services <br />» utilities <br />A complete, updated PEIR. would be prepared integrating the revisions detailed In Chapter 3, Revisions to the Draft <br />PEIR of the original Final FIR, and also reflecting any updated General Plan Policies and Implementation Actions. The <br />publicwould be clearly directed to only comment on the updated chapters as listed above. An updated Final EIR would <br />include the responses In the original FEIR and responses to new comments received on the recirculated chapters. <br />January 28, 20211 Page 3 <br />