My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - #16
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2022
>
06/15/2022 Adjourned
>
Correspondence - #16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/17/2022 8:58:32 AM
Creation date
6/15/2022 1:03:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Date
6/15/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Orozco, Norma <br /> From: Tim Johnson <tjohnson@jlkrllp.com> <br /> Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2022 10:23 AM <br /> To: Bacerra, Phil; Sarmiento, Vicente; Hernandez, Johnathan; Lopez, Jessie; Penaloza, <br /> David; Mendoza, Nelida <br /> Cc: eComment; Downs, Kathryn <br /> Subject: Budget Public Comment- agenda item #16 <br /> Categories: FYI <br /> Mayor and Council (cc Director Downs)...As you consider our upcoming budget(agenda item#16)this evening at the <br /> adjourned regular council meeting, I urge you to consider establishing a policy to formally define a Measure X Sunset <br /> Stabilization Fund. When this topic was discussed at the Budget Workshop on May 12t", it seemed to have support of <br /> the majority of the council. No one spoke in opposition to this item, however I believe at least 4 of those on the dais <br /> specifically spoke in support of such a fund. Below is an email with more information as a refresher to this idea. <br /> Despite the council support at the Budget Workshop, this idea seems to have gone silent. Now, I understand that some <br /> may say that Measure X(MX) is all general revenue and as such any Stabilization Fund would be automatically built into <br /> the general fund excess, however I believe that having a formal policy allows the council to keep this at the forefront of <br /> importance. This will be one of the most important fiscal matters that our city faces, if not the most important fiscal <br /> matters. It deserves the urgency of the council now and in the future. <br /> As Director Downs indicated in her presentation,the Ten-Year Outlook shows that in FY 2029-2030, there is expected to <br /> be a $16M budget deficit due to the decrease in MX sales tax rate (See page 4 of the Staff Report, "Ten-Year General <br /> Fund Outlook", picture below) primarily due to the decrease of MX sales tax rate from 1.5%down to 1.0%. If we do not <br /> plan for this now,we will be hurting in the future. A stabilization fund will soften the impact by putting money away <br /> today in order to have a softer landing in the future where we can spread the impact over a number of years instead of <br /> one big hit. <br /> Te -Vir MPWM FWW mufla* <br /> W9 <br /> ieW! �'NJ }w7 <br /> cu�a rra,• ,.M <br /> wee <br /> uu� <br /> �+ r NMI <br /> nM+ <br /> . +nr +4-1 ram...it <br /> The TgIFYear 4fkck cd aLes 1r*C~af FLInd fRd'y rumor 3 MsrlANJ WdgL4 Not <br /> Wa&we-X fewenue decfc-YAS i0 me Leib+{ummr df FY 2028•29 By FY 2M.37.Wk <br /> eXpW Yo havt m 3rxL.191 uedg�r*e° t t4 apploxawle l SIR llisn The expetted debit <br /> tEfriW�G�J <br /> MX is currently the reason that our city is able to do some great things. However, as Director Downs has indicated, <br /> without MX we would be in a deficit and MX is the reason that we are able to do some of the budget priorities <br /> today. However,we need to prepare for the sunset of MX and we need to do this now. Every year that we wait,the <br /> bigger the impact will be during the sunset period. I know it feels good to be able to fund everyone's budget priorities <br /> 37 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.