Laserfiche WebLink
In the fall of 2021, SOS identified significant unmet need for its services in Santa <br />Ana, where it currently operates the El Sol Wellness Center on Broadway. Given the <br />unmet demand, SOS decided to expand its outpatient clinic capacity by replacing its <br />existing facility with a larger one. In February 2022, Turner and SOS signed a Term <br />Sheet outlining the business terms for a long-term "triple net" lease of the Property to <br />SOS as the tenant to operate a healthcare facility. <br />In March 2022, Turner entered into a purchase and sale agreement to acquire <br />the Property and to lease it to SOS upon approval of remodeling plans by the City. The <br />intended lease between Turner and SOS would include a purchase option which would <br />provide SOS with the right to purchase Turner's interest in the Property. <br />The Property is improved with an 18% occupied three-story, 44,066 square foot <br />commercial office building with 139 surface -parking spaces. The proposed Project <br />involves interior tenant improvements to accommodate medical office uses, including <br />primary care, dental, vision, and pharmacy services. The Property is located in Zone P: <br />Professional, which, according to the January 17, 2023 Staff Report for the Ordinance <br />allows for -profit medical offices "by right." <br />The Unintended , Yet Serious, Consequences Of The Ordinance. <br />The City has not given due consideration to the implications and potential <br />consequences of the Ordinance. First, on its face, the Ordinance purports to subject <br />medical offices operated by "government entities," i.e., by the United States <br />Government or the State of California, to the City's zoning regulations, but the use of <br />land owned by the U.S. or any state, such California, is never subject to the land use <br />regulations of a city or county. This protection also extends to the agents of state and <br />federal governments that are directly implementing the goals, objectives, and programs <br />of such governments. <br />Secondly, the Ordinance purports to require a CUP for any medical offices that <br />are operated by any entities that the Ordinance refers to by the overly -broad and vague <br />term "government -subsidized." As such, any medical office that accepts Medicare, <br />Medicaid, Medi-Cal, or government -subsidized insurance would appear to qualify as a <br />"government -subsidized" entity under the current language of the Ordinance. The same <br />would be true of any office that accepted any PPP loans, any Small Business <br />Association loans, any government subsidized malpractice insurance, or any other kind <br />of grants or loans from the state or federal governments. <br />Unless they were willing to apply for a CUP, the Ordinance would essentially <br />prevent and discourage the owners of any for -profit medical offices in the Professional <br />Share Our Selves 4 1 P a g e <br />