Laserfiche WebLink
The handling and cost implications of such future regulations should be studied, and risk management strategies should be <br />developed, as part of a comprehensive planning approach to PFAS impacts. Santa Ana is aware of EEC's unique PFAS <br />waste disposal expertise and we propose to integrate waste disposal into the Planning Study scope of work. Additional cost <br />savings measures can be studied and identified including spent media dewatering strategies and contracting opportunities <br />with other Producers to allow for bulk service cost savings. <br />Grant Funding <br />The installation, operation, and ongoing maintenance of PFAS treatment systems presents a significant new cost to Santa <br />Ana. EEC proposes to research potential grant funding opportunities, or low interest loan opportunities, to offset or mitigate <br />project costs. Among other potential opportunities, EEC proposes to research Drinking Water State Revolving Fund <br />(DWSRF) program eligibility for project planning, design, and construction costs. <br />Source Investigation and Cost Recovery <br />The City of Santa Ana is a named plaintiff in the OCWD-led lawsuit of PFAS manufacturers over their alleged responsibility <br />in contaminating the Orange County Groundwater Basin (Basin) and may receive cost recovery funds from that lawsuit to <br />offset PFAS treatment system costs. However, the named defendants in the lawsuit may not be the only responsible parties <br />for local contamination within the Basin. If Santa Ana is interested, EEC can analyze existing groundwater PFAS <br />concentrations, hydrogeologic patterns, and available industry and land use data, to facilitate source investigation efforts to <br />identify potential, local sources of PFAS contamination. At their discretion, the City could then pursue cost recovery from <br />potentially responsible parties to offset or reimburse project costs associated with PFAS treatment. <br />ERelevant Experience <br />EEC I City of Santa Ana I Owner's PFAS Representative 12020 - Ongoing <br />Team: Will Shaffer, Dennis Kasper, Jim Kolk, John Shaffer, Brandon Willnecker <br />Project Contact: <br />EEC is providing ongoing expert consulting services to Santa Ana as it works with <br />Cesar Barrera, PE <br />the Orange County Water District (OCWD) and their consultants to design and <br />Deputy Public Works Director <br />install wellhead PFAS treatment for the City's impacted wells. EEC is providing <br />(714) 647-3387 <br />comprehensive technical and regulatory assistance to the City addressing a variety <br />of topics including: <br />• The impact of the State's PFAS Notification Levels (NLs) <br />and Response Levels (RLs) on the City's groundwater <br />supply. <br />• Comparison of Granular Activated Carbon (GAC) vs. Ion <br />Exchange (IX) as viable treatment alternatives at each <br />potentially impacted well site. <br />• Evaluating capital costs vs. on -going O&M costs. <br />• Evaluating rapid small scale column testing (RSSCT) and <br />pilot testing results and the need for further pilot tests. <br />• Water distribution system planning to balance groundwater <br />production and water imports, while minimizing costs, to <br />maintain a secure water supply. <br />• Treatment system training for City engineers, operators, <br />and maintenance staff. <br />• Treatment system design peer review (Wells 27, 28, 31, 38, <br />and 40). <br />• Treatment system construction oversight services. <br />EEC Environmental I 1 November 17.2022 <br />