ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING DEVELOPMENT SOLUTIONS, INC. (3)

Home Browse Search

In by the Santa Ana consultant e Draft EIR and will be As discussed Th . pment, such as City of . This section of the d unavoidable in project would change GPU EIR CEQA adequacy. The consumption of energy GPU EIR less than significant with the applicant’s The . . Air quality was previously A geotechnical investigation by . with thresholds of significance mitigation measures. liquefaction, earthquake faults, five focus areas throughout the ed in the EIR. operational activities, including: use environment. conditions of develo out of the EIR analysis in the IS. - would adequately reduce potential GPU EIR xedor unnecessary and local renewable energy programs. GPU EIR , Air Quality of renewable energy or energy efficiency. were identified as As summarized in Task 1, EPD Solutions will . 2 inefficient, Chapter 5.2 8 new greenhouse gas analysis will be conducted analysis will be conducted was considered less than significant. One primary goal trip generation and site plan peer reviewed by the EPD team and summarized in the a ssessment prepared by the applicant’s consultant and will . a pplicant and reviewed by EPD for a The project site is currently improved with multiple commercial rely on the shade/shadow analysis and any visual simulations less than significant in Chapter 5.5 of the GPU EIR ’s team . esources EIR r Review new air quality ssment will be ssessment in the Draft EIR. The air quality analysis will be summariz a construction specifications, the site plan, and trip generationAs summarized in Task 1, EPD will provide a peer review of this analysis. a GPU , Peer is to encourage future development within 1 impact due to wasteful, istorical Greenhouse gas impacts were identified as significant an t Air Quality Management District and the thresholds defined in Appendix G impacts and, to reduce GHG emissions to a less than significant level. h peer review of the paleontological resources assessment and will summarize n As described above, . and will provide mitigation based on the by the applicant y impacts were identified as less than significant and paleontological impacts were y’s CAP. esources r .1, Aesthetics of the Impacts to historical resources were previously identified as a significant and pursuant to GPU EIR aesthetic GPU EIR General Plan Geolog and Technical Study istorical of the h As described Task .7 Chapter 5 in Chapter 5.4 of the : with some buildings constructed as early as 197 Energy impacts were identified as : Santa Ana , including the South Bristol Street Focus Area in which the project is located Chapter 5 Aesthetics of the Citythe visual character of the site from one of large block retail to a miEIR will look at theconducted for the project Air Quality:pursuant requirements of CEQA, and based on the identified as a significant and unavoidable impact in would include a comprehensive evaluation of regional and local emissions and odors from construction and operation of the project. The EIR will compare the findings of the assessment established by the South Coasof the CEQA Guidelines. Further, the assessment will evaluate whether the project would be consistent with the Air Quality Management Plan. Cultural Resources:unavoidable impact and impacts to archaeological resources mitigationbuildings, perform a peer review of the summarize the Similarly, the cultural resources asseDraft EIR. Mitigation measures will be provided in the Draft EIR, if necessary.Energy under Task 1, EPD Solutions will provide a peer review of the energy assessment and will summarize whether the project would result in aresources or conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan forAdditionally, the project will be analyzed for consistency with state Geology & Soils:identified as less than significant with mitigation in Chapter 5.6 of the will be prepared for the project site by the investigation will examine existing site conditions, including hazards such assubsidence, and others. If it is determined the application of standardcompliance with the recommendations of the geotechnical investigation,impacts to an insignificant level, Geology and Soils would be scopedaddition, EPD will provide a the results in the Draft EIR Greenhouse Gas Emissions:Chapter 5.7 of the applicant’s consultant evaluated against the CitA summary of the GHG analysis will be included in the EIR to evaluate the potential impacts associated with the project’s generation of GHG emissions during construction andconstruction, area sources, mobile sources, energy consumption (electricity and natural gas), water consumption, and solid waste generation. Mitigation measures will be identified, if necessary, beyond those in Proposal for CEQA Related Bristol Specific Plan