ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING DEVELOPMENT SOLUTIONS, INC. (3)

Home Browse Search

f e exhibits, Santa Ana the Draft less than alternatives in City of in initiating the in Chapter 5.15 To determine the reader a clearer impacts related to Management Plan, EIR es could be extended to th mpacts, significant cumulative of up to three (3) Urban Water IR. These alternatives would be and provide the with identifying and/or refining any and CalRecycle data will be reviewed to , service systems were identified as less than EPD will assist the City by providing significant and unavoidable for an Alternatives section is included in this . EPD Solutions will assist the City water provider’s 10 GPU EIR EPD will help staff project’s potential impact on the dry utilities (natural gas, open space components. As summarized in Task 1, a Water Supply Assessment would be . This chapter summarizes those environmental effects that are found Review mitigation measures that would need to be incorporated into to assist in the evaluation process Transportation were identified as less than significant in Chapter 5.16 o GPU EIR Peer Draft EIR prepared for the project would likely be a Supplemental EIR, no gal, and regulatory basis; and would avoid or substantially lessen at least City’s Storm Drain Master Plan ct with a program, plan ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system; Impacts related to utilities and the demand new residents would have on existing facilities, and discuss any Impacts related to Tribal Cultural Resources were identified as and will summarize its conclusions in the Draft EIR. In addition, the Draft EIR will : As the Plan, confli rces: planation of the analysis. Master Impacts related to and Technical Study Due to introduction of new residential uses on the project site, it is anticipated that the project significant and those which are deemed significant and unavoidable. This section also includes . - Impacts related to Recreation were identified as entified for the proposed project. In addition, a summary matrix that presents and contrasts the Alternatives. . As described under Task 1, EPD will peer review the vehicle miles traveled analysis prepared Other CEQA Considerations. performance standards or . than . U EIR - & Service Systems7 6 GP ificant impacts related to utilities. GPU EIR Recreation:of the will result in an increased demand for recreational services. The EIR will identify existing recreational facilities in the project vicinity, discussimpacts associated with the project’s proposed Transportation:the by the applicant’s consultant discuss impacts related to impacts related to hazards due to geometric design features or incompatible uses; and inadequate emergency access to the project site. Tribal Cultural Resou significant with mitigation in Chapter 5.17 of the SB 18 and AB 52 notification and consultation for the project. maps, or graphics where pertinent understanding or exnecessary EIR.Utilities significant in Chapter 5.18 of the prepared by the applicant’s team and peer reviewed by EPD for inclusion in the Draft EIR. effect on existing utility providers and infrastructure, the the City’s Sewer determine the current levels of service and theelectricity, and cable service), solid waste, wastewater treatment and distribution, and potable water supplyand distribution. The analysis will determine whether utility facilities and servicproject site, while maintaining existing levels of service in areas already served. It is anticipated that thereare no significant impacts related to utilities. Mitigation measures will be provided, if necessary, to reducesign Chapter to be lessother EIR sections mandated by CEQA, including a discussion of irreversible iimpacts, and growth inducement resulting from the project.Chapter Alternatives section would be required. However, the scope proposal in case preparation of a Subsequent Draft EIR is needed.The project alternatives section includes a range of alternatives to be analyzed that meet project objectives; are feasible on an economic, leone significant impact of the project. The EPD team has estimated analysis addition to the “No Project” alternative in the Administrative Draft Edeveloped as part of the preparation of the Administrative Draft EIR. The Administrative Draft EIR will include a discussion of the environmental impacts associated with each alternative and compare the impacts with those idenvironmental effects of each alternative as compared to the proposed project will be prepared.Proposal for CEQA Related Bristol Specific Plan