Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br />. . <br />es <br />EIR <br />and and <br /> <br /> <br />Santa Ana <br />GPU <br /> <br />The project <br />compliance <br />ld not have <br />prepare <br />City of <br />by the project <br />We understand <br /> <br /> <br />Native American <br />will <br /> <br />EPD <br />consultation process <br />respond to the tribes’ <br /> <br /> <br />notification letters for the <br /> <br />and technical studies, where <br /> <br /> <br />City of Santa Ana’s <br />is no longer subject to challenge <br />site infrastructure improvements, <br />- <br />will be responsible for posting of <br />adequacy for CEQA <br />& SB18 <br /> <br /> <br />provide a summary of the cultural <br />obtain feedback and close out the <br />and <br /> <br />for <br />GPU EIR <br />appropriate and reliable to tier from <br /> <br />is <br />. A final project description will be used <br />for the project have been prepared <br />EIR <br /> <br />Senate Bill 18 (SB18) <br />U <br /> <br /> <br />EPD will attend and lead the Scoping Meeting. <br />of Technical Studies n <br />, and the City <br /> <br /> <br />GP <br />off meeting and a draft schedule (using Microsoft <br />-and <br />submitted to the City for review <br /> <br /> <br />re major revisions to the certified EIR 2) substantial <br />EIR has expired <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />and NOA <br />s website. <br />GPU <br />City of Santa Ana’s <br />’ <br /> <br />Consultatio <br />can Heritage Commission and local tribes, requesting the <br />related information (project description, plans, construction <br /> <br />- <br />Peer Review <br />all technical studies <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />incorporates the latest plans, off <br />and <br />. In addition, this scope of work assumes the <br />the proposed mitigation measures and <br />that <br />, <br /> <br /> <br />he City and applicant, where the EIR scope, schedule, and process <br />EIR will be prepared to tier from the <br />t <br /> <br /> <br />to provide the project overview, <br /> <br />of the NOP <br />Review <br />the technical studies <br />level <br />project details. EPD will revise the project description based on City and <br />- <br />Peer <br /> <br />refore, we assume that the <br /> <br />ject <br />Statement of Overriding Considerations <br />and Senate Bill 18 <br />includes review of the technical studies <br />The <br />, and ultimately, the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) analysis. <br />understanding <br />provide mitigation measures, agreed upon as necessary by the City to reduce <br />ss than significant level. <br />work and schedule, and discretionary approvals required for the project. <br />Project Description <br /> <br /> <br />NOP <br />off meeting with <br />off Meeting and Scope <br />- <br />- <br />IS/ <br />in newspaper and on the Cityassist the City with coordination with the tribes to <br />and <br />the public noticing <br /> peer review of <br /> <br /> <br />Kick <br /> <br />Findings and <br />and Technical Study <br /> Notice of DeterminationProject Management and MeetingsPublic Hearings <br /> <br />(as reviewed and deemed appropriate by the City) <br /> for <br />.1 <br /> <br />: :: : <br /> <br />1 <br />6789and additional technical analysis provided in the project technical studies prepared by the <br />is peer review <br /> <br />Peer Review of Technical Studies <br />Project DescriptionAssembly Bill 52 <br /> <br />construction <br /> <br />put <br />will be provided to the City and applicant for their thorough review, checking for accuracy of <br /> <br />e <br />accuracy and consistency of project <br />Th <br />is based on our <br />A supplemental pro <br />23 4 <br /> d <br />. <br />ssist the City in completing the Native American consultation process. The City, as the Lead Agency, <br />perform <br />.. <br />and NOA <br />. EPD will <br /> <br />Task TaskTask Task <br />Project Initiation, <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br />the time for challenging the sufficiency of the <br />scope <br /> <br /> This provided to the City for EPD’s peer reviewbe responsiblethe NOP This scope of work considers and relies upon the appropriatapplicantCEQA Section 21166 provides that "no subsequent <br /> or supplemental environmental impact report shall be required by the lead agency or any responsible agency" unless one of three circumstances apply: 1) substantial changes to the approved <br /> project will requichanges occur with respect to the circumstances under which the approved project is being undertaken will require major revisions to the certified EIR, or 3) new information, <br /> that was not known and coubeen known at the time the EIR for the approved project was certified becomes available. that(CEQA § 21167, subd. (c)). for this project. Task Subtask Task <br /> EPD will attend a kickwill be discussed. EPD will prepare an agenda for the kickProject) for review. Subtask 1.EPD will prepare a project description that anticipatedescription understanding <br /> of the project and applicant inas the basis for the Subtask 1EPD will ais responsible for initiating the Assembly Bill 52 (AB 52)EPD will assist by contacting the Native AmeriSacred <br /> Land File search on behalf of the City, and preparing the AB 52City’s review and approval. EPD will prepare and distribute all mailings and will attend anyconsultations, if requested <br /> by the Cityresources assessment’s findings, presentquestionsconsultation effortpotential impacts to a le Subtask 1.EPD will applicantrelated to Proposal for CEQA Related Bristol Specific <br /> Plan <br /> <br />