My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 13 - OC Grand Jury's Investigative Report, Findings, and Recommendations Regarding Group Homes and the Orange County Animal Care Shelter
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2023
>
08/15/2023 Regular
>
Item 13 - OC Grand Jury's Investigative Report, Findings, and Recommendations Regarding Group Homes and the Orange County Animal Care Shelter
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2024 3:40:01 PM
Creation date
8/9/2023 4:32:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
13
Date
8/15/2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
128
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
WELCOME TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD <br />Although the City of Costa Mesa has been front and center in the legal fights related to <br />group homes, it was Newport Beach that first stepped into the arena in 2008. Three <br />companies sued the City over an ordinance that was approved by the City Council in <br />2008 that regulated group homes for recovering addicts-9 Pacific Shores Properties, <br />Newport Coast Recovery, and Yellowstone Women's First Step House sued Newport <br />Beach for a total of $5.24 million. Still in place today, this ordinance was the first of its <br />kind in Orange County and it established quiet hours, parking and smoking areas, and <br />van routes. It also required the City's approval for new unlicensed homes for recovering <br />addicts in certain neighborhoods. In 2015, the City reached the end of its seven-year <br />Legal battle -over sober -living homes with a settlement agreement.10 11 <br />According to the Orange County Register, which cites its own archives, Newport Beach <br />spent at least four million dollars in legal costs on the cases. In 2008, there were 81 <br />facilities and 614 total beds identified in Newport Beach. In 2021, there were a known <br />30 facilities with 210 total beds. Where did all those facilities and beds go?12 Perhaps to <br />the City of Costa Mesa. In 2015, the City of Costa Mesa enacted their own ordinance <br />(amended in 2017) after seeing a sharp increase in the number of sober living homes <br />followed by a steep increase in the number of community complaints. On the heels of <br />the ordinance came the legal challenges, and Costa Mesa prevailed in all challenges <br />until January 2023 when two sober living homes, embroiled in litigation against the city, <br />were handed a legal victory in federal court. The earlier dismissal was reversed and <br />remanded by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals which ruled that asking operators of <br />sober living facilities for proof of disability violates federal law barring discrimination <br />against those with disabilities and bars discrimination in housing. <br />As the. legal battle waged on, other local governments explored, advanced, or enacted <br />regulation of sober living homes, including the County of Orange (2015), and Cities of <br />_ - Laguna Hills (2015), San -Clemente (2016), Laguna Niguel (2016), San Juan Capistrano <br />(2016), Anaheim (2020), and Huntington Beach (2020). Most of these entities, perhaps <br />all, -have chosen not to enforce their ordinances out of concern of potential litigation, and <br />are waiting for Costa Mesa's litigation to conclude. <br />Cities Are Standing Alone <br />Multiple cities in the County have executed ordinances to regulate unlicensed group <br />homes. With the exception of the newly formed South Orange County Sober Living and <br />ORANGE COUNTY GRAND JURY 2022 1 2023 Page 12 of 42 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.