My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 13 - OC Grand Jury's Investigative Report, Findings, and Recommendations Regarding Group Homes and the Orange County Animal Care Shelter
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2023
>
08/15/2023 Regular
>
Item 13 - OC Grand Jury's Investigative Report, Findings, and Recommendations Regarding Group Homes and the Orange County Animal Care Shelter
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2024 3:40:01 PM
Creation date
8/9/2023 4:32:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
13
Date
8/15/2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
128
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
WELCOME TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD <br />Recovery Task Force, cities have not collaborated on solutions to shared and common <br />problems. This has been done on an individual basis, with little collaboration among <br />cities. Prior to drafting an ordinance, some cities study the details and effectiveness of <br />other cities' actions, particularly the City of Costa Mesa's ordinance, and use that as a <br />template to draft their own.13 <br />Once enacted, few of the ordinances are being enforced. This lack of enforcement is <br />due to a small number of very specific impediments and concerns. These include: <br />• Fear of litigation costs due to lawsuits filed by group home operators against <br />cities that have enforced ordinances. (The City of Costa Mesa has reportedly <br />incurred over ten million dollars in legal fees in relation to group home litigation.) <br />• Fear of the State of California withholding approval of the Housing Element for <br />cities that have ordinances related to the management of group homes, resulting <br />in the potential loss of state funds and local zoning control. <br />• Lack of enforcement resources. Most cities do not have the staff resources to <br />enforce these ordinances. <br />While individual cities take a wait -and -see approach to follow the progress of other cities <br />that are standing up to the State, little progress is being made. The cities and County of <br />Orange would benefit by working in partnership with one another to garner resources <br />and create a coalition to promote change. While the newly constituted South Orange <br />County Sober Living and Recovery Task Force is a good start, and the first tangible <br />recognition of the need to work together, the Grand Jury recommends a countywide <br />cooperative taskforce. <br />Orange County's cities and unincorporated areas are demographically diverse.The <br />active sharing of ideas, experiences, and information will be valuable to the overall <br />process of developing a worthwhile model ordinance and plan for moving forward in the <br />efforts to protect both the individual characteristics of Orange County neighborhoods, <br />and all individuals living in those neighborhoods. <br />Fear of Litigation Costs <br />Cities are concerned about.the high cost of litigation and the time required to defend <br />ordinances regulating group homes. Private entities have challenged ordinances and in <br />some cases won, and in other cases continued to pursue lawsuits in spite of opposition. <br />In one case, the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) <br />requested that the California Department of Justice file a "friend of the court" application <br />to intervene on behalf the litigant in its case against the City.14 <br />ORANGE COUNTY GRAND JURY 2022 12023 Page 13 of 42 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.