My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 13 - OC Grand Jury's Investigative Report, Findings, and Recommendations Regarding Group Homes and the Orange County Animal Care Shelter
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2023
>
08/15/2023 Regular
>
Item 13 - OC Grand Jury's Investigative Report, Findings, and Recommendations Regarding Group Homes and the Orange County Animal Care Shelter
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2024 3:40:01 PM
Creation date
8/9/2023 4:32:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
13
Date
8/15/2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
128
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
WELCOME TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD <br />the people in neighborhoods which have been impacted by the over -concentration of <br />group homes, and/or the level of nuisances generated by the group homes. <br />f discipline, <br />e to the public <br />A lack of understanding of the challenges faced by cities leads to the perception that <br />they are unwilling to step up and regulate the various group home types that are <br />springing up in neighborhoods. Public education will reveal that there is not an <br />unwillingness of cities, or the public, to find resolutions, but rather there are many <br />hurdles promulgated by State and federal agencies that often prevent opportunities for <br />reaching a solution. Cities should work together, and with State legislators and other <br />stakeholders, to look for ways to affect change at the State level as well as provide <br />more focused public education that addresses these issues. <br />In an effort to inform their citizens, some cities have used the multi -discipline, <br />educational, townhall type response to the public outcry while others have not. The <br />outcome can be quite different. <br />To illustrate, we heed look no further than a tale of three cities: Anaheim, Newport <br />Beach, and Laguna Hills. Anaheim's group home issue heated up in October 2021 <br />when Grandma's House of Hope requested a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to use a <br />large house as a transitional living home for 19 intractably mentally ill women.26 <br />-_-- It was not Grandma's House -of Hope's first group home in Anaheim; it was the latest in <br />many previously successful CUP requests. Local residents coalesced against this CUP <br />request in a vocal and organized manner. Whether it was the number of residents <br />impacted, the descriptor of the group home residents as intractably mentally ill, or just <br />one group home too many in this neighborhood, this organized effort to prevent the <br />- approval of the large group home attracted hundreds of local citizens and activists from <br />both sides of the issue. It seemed that the majority of these people attended the <br />planning commission meeting to voice their opinions during the public comment portion <br />_- of the.agenda and to let the City's Planning Commission see the strength of their <br />numbers. <br />ORANGE COUNTY GRAND JURY 2022 12023 Page 20 of 42 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.