My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 13 - OC Grand Jury's Investigative Report, Findings, and Recommendations Regarding Group Homes and the Orange County Animal Care Shelter
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2023
>
08/15/2023 Regular
>
Item 13 - OC Grand Jury's Investigative Report, Findings, and Recommendations Regarding Group Homes and the Orange County Animal Care Shelter
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2024 3:40:01 PM
Creation date
8/9/2023 4:32:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
13
Date
8/15/2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
128
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
WELCOME TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD <br />The Planning Commission was seemingly prepared to accept the staff recommendation <br />for approval. Public comment took over five hours, most of which was overwhelmingly <br />against the approval of the group home. The applicant and the Planning Commission <br />both expressed surprise at the public backlash. Ultimately, the approval <br />recommendation was scrapped, and the Planning Commission voted to deny the CUP. <br />Grandma's House filed an appeal and the application for the CUP was heard by the City <br />-. Council. The public attended that meeting in larger numbers than at the Planning <br />_ Commission meeting .and they were every bit as angry and frustrated as they were at <br />the earlier meeting.In spite of robust response on the issue at the meeting of the <br />Planning Commission just two months earlier, the Anaheim City Council was <br />unprepared for the charged nature of the adversarial clash. Most speakers were <br />passionate but respectful, while some were rude and offensive. It was essentially an <br />angrier :repeat -of the first meeting and led to the same conclusion, a denial of the <br />CUP.27 <br />----- = - The affected public walked away with no better understanding of the reasons why these <br />group homes are hard --to regulate due to the pressures put on cities by the State of <br />California. The applicant ultimately filed suit against the city alleging violations of the <br />Housing Element Law, Housing Accountability Act, and statutes governing anti- <br />discrimination in local land use laws. <br />iveany zuu people .packed the Mission Viejo City Council chamber on March 29 for a Town Hall meeting <br />regarding sober.livirig. homes. (Tomoya Shimura, Orange County Register, April 1, 2016) <br />The City of Anaheim_ has not _responded to the public concerns in an organized manner. <br />- It has not provided an opportunity for the public to come together in a townhall-like <br />meeting where the -City could address the issues and the challenges they face, have <br />subject matter experts .on hand for short presentations, and allow for comments and <br />questions .28 <br />ORANGE COUNTY GRAND JURY 2022 12023 Page 21 of.42 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.