Laserfiche WebLink
<br />City of Santa Ana RFP 23-041 <br />Page A1-4 <br /> <br />TASK 4 – SMART CITY ASSESMENT <br /> <br />Provide recommendations regarding the ability to incorporate Smart City components and <br />strategies that leverage existing City infrastructure investments, would yield cost/energy <br />efficiencies, or may serve as a platform for future technologies. <br /> <br />- The City is currently deploying a Sensus FlexNet system as part of an Advanced Water <br />Meter project. <br />- The City currently owns and operates an extensive Traffic Signal fiber network with <br />Intelligent Transportation System. <br />- The City anticipates a vast expansion of fiber-optic cable installation throughout the City. <br />- The City currently permits Small Cellular network devices to be mounted on street lights. <br />- Develop a formal Assessment document. <br /> <br />TASK 5 – COST OF SERVICE EVALUATION <br /> <br />Review funding streams including current revenue sources, past and projected expenditures. <br /> <br />- Research and provide guidance for Funding Streams or grant opportunities. Identify <br />funding opportunities including grants, development projects, City project, Assessment <br />Districts. <br />- Research and provide findings of benefits or disadvantage of purchasing the SCE owned <br />LS1 lighting. <br />- Assess Energy costs and provide recommendation for savings. <br />- Provide recommendations for fully funding street light program needs and program <br />recommendations for next 5-10 years. <br />- Develop a formal evaluation document. <br /> <br />TASK 6 – PROGRAM RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> <br />Provide the City with specific long-term and short-term recommendations for upgrades to the <br />lighting system. Consultant to study the potential cost savings associated with recommended <br />enhancement. <br /> <br />- Categorize recommendations as either a) long-term, or b) short-term upgrades/repairs <br />- Develop a map with recommended "zones" which outline areas to be upgraded in the <br />short-term and long-term. <br />- Identify the above zones by priority of upgrade or repair. <br />- Recommend hardware to be used for upgrades considering compatibility with existing <br />City hardware, or compatibility based on future improvements, considering effectiveness <br />and efficiency. <br />- Provide an order of magnitude cost for each zone. <br />