My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 26 - Updated Hazard Mitigation Plan
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2023
>
01/17/2023 Regular & Special SA
>
Item 26 - Updated Hazard Mitigation Plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2023 10:34:37 AM
Creation date
8/11/2023 10:33:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Item #
26
Date
1/17/2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
157
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> Hazard Mitigation Plan | 2022 <br />Planning Process <br />- 9 - <br />Q&A | ELEMENT A: PLANNING PROCESS | A1b. <br />Q: Does the plan list the jurisdiction(s) participating in the plan that are seeking approval? (Requirement <br />§201.6(c)(1)) <br />A: See Planning Process below. <br />Planning Process <br />Throughout the project, the Planning Team served as the primary stakeholders while also making <br />a concerted effort to gather information from the general public, external agencies (utility providers <br />and special districts). In addition, the Planning Team solicited information from agencies and <br />people with specific knowledge of hazards and past historical events, as well as building codes <br />and facilities maintenance planning. The hazard mitigation strategies contained in this plan were <br />developed through an extensive planning process involving City staff, general public, and external <br />agencies. <br /> <br />Following review and input by the Planning Team to the First Draft Plan, next (still during the Plan <br />Writing Phase), the Second Draft Plan was shared with the general public and external agencies <br />(adjoining jurisdictions, utility providers, special districts, etc.). The general public and external <br />agencies served as the secondary stakeholders. Next, the comments gathered from the <br />secondary stakeholders were incorporated into a Third Draft Plan which was submitted to Cal <br />OES and FEMA along with a request for a determination of “Approval Pending Adoption”. <br /> <br />Next, the Planning Team completed amendments to the Plan to reflect mandated input by Cal <br />OES and FEMA. The Final Draft Plan was then posted in advance of the City Council public <br />meeting. Any comments gathered were included in the staff report to the City Council. Following <br />adoption by the City Council, proof of adoption was forwarded to FEMA with a request for <br />approval. The FEMA Letter of Approval was included in the Final Plan. The planning process <br />described above is portrayed below in a progression: <br /> <br />Q&A | ELEMENT A: PLANNING PROCESS | A1a. <br />Q: Does the plan document the planning process, including how it was prepared (with a narrative <br />description, meeting minutes, sign-in sheets, or another method)? (Requirement §201.6(c)(1)) <br />A: See Plan Methodology and Planning Phases Progression below. <br />Q&A | ELEMENT A: PLANNING PROCESS | A3a. <br />Q: Does the plan document how the public was given the opportunity to be involved in the planning <br />process? (Requirement §201.6(b)(1)) <br />A: See Planning Phases Progression below. <br />Q&A | ELEMENT A: PLANNING PROCESS | A6a. <br />Q: Does the plan identify how, when, and by whom the plan will be monitored (how will implementation <br />be tracked) over time? (Requirement §201.6(c)(4)(i)) <br />A: See Planning Phases Progression below. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.