My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 41 - Amendment Application No. 2022-01 and Appeal Nos. 2022-01 and 2022-02
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2022
>
12/20/2022 Special & Regular
>
Item 41 - Amendment Application No. 2022-01 and Appeal Nos. 2022-01 and 2022-02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/2/2024 2:21:12 PM
Creation date
8/11/2023 4:02:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Item #
41
Date
12/20/2022
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
355
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Community Plan Exemption Checklist <br />City of Santa Ana Gary Avenue Business Park Project <br />removed as part of the Project. Tree removal and/or indirect impacts from construction activity during nesting <br />season (February 1 to August 31) could result in the disturbance of nesting migratory species covered under <br />the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and California Fish and Game Code Section 3503. However, <br />compliance with these existing regulations, as ensure through the City's development permitting process, the <br />Project would not result in new impacts on migratory fish or wildlife species. <br />e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources? <br />No New Impact. The City of Santa Ana Municipal Code Chapter 33, Regulation of the Planting, <br />Maintenance, and Removal of Trees, establishes regulations and standards related to public trees and street <br />trees. The Project would install street trees along Garry Avenue that would be ensured to be incompliance <br />with City regulations through the City's development permitting process. Therefore, the Project would result <br />in no new impacts on local policies or ordinance protecting biological resources. <br />f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community <br />Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? <br />No New Impact. The Project site is outside of the Significant Ecological Areas (SEAS) identified in the GPU <br />EIR. There are no other Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved <br />local, regional, or state habitat conservation plans that apply to the Project site. Therefore, the Project would <br />result in no new impacts on habitat conservation plans. <br />Conclusion <br />With regards to the issue area of biological resources, the following findings can be made: <br />1. No peculiar impacts to the Project or its site have been identified. <br />2. There are no potentially significant off -site and/or cumulative impacts which were not discussed by <br />the GPU EIR. <br />3. No substantial new information has been identified which results in an impact which is more severe <br />than anticipated by the GPU EIR. <br />Uniformly Applied Development Policies or Standards (DP/S) <br />Compliance with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and California Fish and Game Code Section 3503. <br />GPU EIR Mitigation Measures Applicable to the Project <br />None. <br />45 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.