My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 21 - Pressure Control Station Relocation and Transmission Main Improvements
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2022
>
05/17/2022 Special and Regular
>
Item 21 - Pressure Control Station Relocation and Transmission Main Improvements
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/4/2024 4:44:00 PM
Creation date
8/15/2023 1:44:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Item #
21
Date
5/17/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SA-2 Pressure Control Station Relocation <br />and Transmission Main Improvements <br />RFP No. 21-127 <br />Construction Phasing <br />Construction phasing will be a key element of the project design and specifications. We will work with <br />the City to minimize the impacts of the construction to the adjoining commercial and residential <br />properties, including the school. We are sensitive to their concerns regarding construction impacts and <br />concerns of the local residences, school and businesses along the proposed alignment. We will <br />consider the following: identify the schools, churches and emergency facilities; develop plans to <br />minimize impacts; maintain access to all commercial, businesses, and residences; evaluate <br />construction noise impacts; and limit the length of the Work Zone. Our previous experience has shown <br />the importance of limiting the length of the total work zone the contractor will be allowed. By requiring <br />the contractor to phase his construction, pressure test, pace final pavement and perform clean-up <br />within reasonable working limits prior to starting new excavation work, the construction impacts to the <br />community/public are minimized. <br />CE0 n <br />Tetra Tech understands the City's process for CEQA approval as we have previously completed the <br />CEQA documentation for Well 32 and Washington Well Rehabilitation Projects. Our CEQA Manager, <br />Paula Fell, has an excellent working relationship with the City's staff due to these projects. <br />The City desires to attain the highest Envision Rating possible for this project. All design work shall be <br />completed with the intent to enter the Envision Award process. Tetra Tech's Project Team has <br />extensive experience in the Envision Certification process. Within the Relevant Experience Section of <br />our proposal, we have listed six (6) projects where Tetra Tech has obtained or pursued a Envision <br />Award of Gold Rating. Due to this experience, Tetra Tech will be able to recommend the most <br />appropriate verification pathway, design and be able to manage the Envision Verification Process on <br />behalf of the City. <br />Rey uesign ueCisivi <br />Based on our understanding of this project due to preparing the feasibility study, Tetra Tech envisions <br />the following key design decisions that will need to be made by the City: <br />Confirm PRS and hydro -generator mechanical plan layout. <br />Location of PRS facility: either 116 or 202 South Flower Street. Tetra Tech recommends that the <br />site not selected be allowed by the City to be used by the contractor as his staging area during <br />construction. <br />PRS facility to be constructed: within a wall enclosure; within a building; or within a below grade <br />vault structure. <br />Tetra Tech will prepare preliminary layouts at each site for these three options. Based on noise <br />impacts, Tetra Tech has assumed a below grade vault structure will be selected by the City. <br />Pipeline alignment selection within West 1st Street, including traffic control. <br />Pipe material selection and recommended thrust restraint. <br />Architectural features of the site, including 3D renderings of the site. <br />Alternative strategies to store energy from the hydro -generator as well as any solar paneling or <br />other alternative energy generation devices. Evaluate locations for possible battery storage <br />unites (size and footprint). <br />Electrical and control system operating procedures for the PRS and the hydro -generator facility. <br />I Recommendations for communication between SA-2 and Walnut Pump Station. <br />TETRA TECH Page 18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.