My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 21 - Pressure Control Station Relocation and Transmission Main Improvements
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2022
>
05/17/2022 Special and Regular
>
Item 21 - Pressure Control Station Relocation and Transmission Main Improvements
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/4/2024 4:44:00 PM
Creation date
8/15/2023 1:44:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Item #
21
Date
5/17/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SA-2 Pressure Control Station Relocation <br />and Transmission Main Improvements <br />RFP No. 21-127 <br />SCOPE OF WORK <br />Members of our Project Team have performed an in-depth review of the scope of work contained in the <br />Request for Proposal (RFP), performed a site visit and are very familiar with the existing conditions that <br />may impact the work since we prepared the SA-2 Feasibility Study. Because of the proposal page <br />limitation, we acknowledge the scope of work contained in the RFP and have only added the below <br />tasks that we have comments on or wanted to expand on. <br />Task 1: Project Administration and Multi -Agency Coordination <br />Tetra Tech's initial schedule will include the critical path designation and a description of and schedule <br />for progress meetings dealing with Key Design Decisions stated in our Approach Section (Key Design <br />Decisions). Tetra Tech will continually reference the critical path schedule on our bi-weekly status <br />e-mails and monthly schedule updates. <br />For the purpose of this proposal, Tetra Tech has assumed the following ten (10) meetings: kick-off; <br />one (1) meeting with MWD; two (2) meetings with SCE; four (4) design process review meetings (Basis <br />of Design, 60%, 90% and Final PS&E); and two (2) meetings regarding permits with Public Works, <br />Building, Fire, and Traffic. <br />ask 2: As Built and Utility Research <br />Tetra Tech has already performed the preliminary utility research within the project area as part of our <br />SA-2 Feasibility Study. Tetra Tech will update the utility research due to time that has passed since the <br />previous utility research work. <br />The topographic design survey and the boundary survey for the City selected site will be performed by <br />Tetra Tech's in-house survey crews. The boundary survey will include setting survey monuments to <br />mark the property corners and the recordation of a Record of Survey with the County of Orange. <br />The level of effort for potholing and corresponding traffic control plans will be consistent with what was <br />performed during the Well 32 Rehabilitation Project for the City and Mesa's Well Pipelines project <br />(which involved potholing within the City of Santa Ana streets). <br />Tack I- rP_nfP_rkni I 0--m—rlatlnne <br />Leighton Consulting, Inc., Tetra Tech's subconsultant, will perform the geotechnical investigation for <br />this project. Leighton is proposing to perform one boring at the PRS site (depth of 25 feet below grade) <br />and five (5) borings along the proposed pipeline alignment (depth of 10 feet below grade). The <br />geotechnical investigation report will include a summary of: site conditions; geologic hazards; <br />seismicity; corrosivity; foundation design for both a vault house and retaining walls; lateral earth <br />pressures; pipe installation requirements; and construction considerations. Traffic control per WATCH <br />Manual will prepared for all geotechnical field work. <br />i ask 4: Civil Operational Project Design Standard and Criteria <br />Tetra Tech will work with the City staff to determine the applicable design standards and criteria in <br />addition to those defined by the feasibility study. For the purposes of this proposal, we have assumed <br />a maximum of eight (8) three (3) hour workshop sessions shall be conducted. The following is a brief <br />summary of the various key design elements, as a minimum, to be discussed in these workshops: <br />Pipe alignment including pipe material, thrust restraint, and traffic control concepts; <br />PRS and hydro -generator mechanical plan layout; <br />PRS location and construction alternatives: wall enclosure; within a building; within vault. <br />TETRA TECH Page 110 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.