Laserfiche WebLink
Santa Ana General Plan Update <br />CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement <br />Of Overriding Considerations -26- October 2021 <br />V. FINDINGS REGARDING POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS <br />The following potentially significant environmental impacts were analyzed in the PEIR, and the <br />effects of the project were considered. Because of environmental analysis of the project and the <br />identification of relevant General Plan policies; compliance with existing laws, codes, and statutes; <br />and the identification of feasible mitigation measures, some potentially significant impacts have <br />been determined by the City to be reduced to a level of less than significant, and the City has <br />found—in accordance with CEQA Section 21081(a)(1) and State CEQA Guidelines Section <br />15091(a) (1)—that “Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project <br />which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment.” This is referred to herein as <br />“Finding 1.” <br />Where the City has determined—pursuant to CEQA Section 21081(a)(2) and State CEQA <br />Guidelines Section 15091(a)(2)—that “Those changes or alterations are within the responsibility <br />and jurisdiction of another public agency and have been, or can and should be, adopted by that <br />other agency,” the City’s finding is referred to herein as “Finding 2.” <br />Where, as a result of the environmental analysis of the project, the City has determined that either <br />(1) even with the identification of project design features, compliance with existing laws, codes <br />and statutes, and/or the identification of feasible mitigation measures, potentially significant <br />impacts cannot be reduced to a level of less than significant, or (2) no feasible mitigation <br />measures or alternatives are available to mitigate the potentially significant impact, the City has <br />found in accordance with CEQA Section 21081(a)(3) and State CEQA Guidelines Section <br />15091(a)(3) that “Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, <br />including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, <br />make infeasible the mitigation measures or alternatives identified in the environmental impact <br />report.” This is referred to herein as “Finding 3.” <br />A. IMPACTS MITIGATED TO LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT <br />The following summary describes impacts of the proposed project that, without mitigation, would <br />result in significant adverse impacts. Upon implementation of the mitigation measures provided <br />in the PEIR, the impacts would be considered less than significant. <br />1. Air Quality <br />Impact 5.2-6: Industrial land uses accommodated under the General Plan update could <br />create other emissions, such as those leading to objectionable odors, that <br />would adversely affect a substantial number of people. <br />Industrial land uses associated with the GPU may generate potentially significant odor impacts <br />for a substantial number of people. Impacts from potential odors generated from residential and <br />other nonresidential land uses associated with the GPU are considered less than significant. <br />Impacts associated with construction-generated odors are considered less than significant.