My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 32 - EIR No. 2020-03 and GPA No.2020-06 Santa Ana General Plan Update
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2022
>
01/18/2022 Regular & Special SA
>
Item 32 - EIR No. 2020-03 and GPA No.2020-06 Santa Ana General Plan Update
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2023 2:43:13 PM
Creation date
8/16/2023 2:43:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
32
Date
1/18/2022
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
319
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES THAT WERE DETERMINED NOT TO BE POTENTIALLY <br /> AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT <br /> A. IMPACTS DETERMINED TO BE LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT DURING THE SCOPING <br /> PROCESS <br /> Based on the public scoping process (including review of NOP responses and input at the public <br /> scoping meeting), in addition to analysis prepared for the Draft PEIR, the City determined, based <br /> upon the threshold criteria for significance, that the project would have no impact or a less than <br /> significant impact on the following potential environmental issues (see Updated Draft PEIR, <br /> Chapter 8, Impacts Found Not to Be Significant). It was determined, therefore, that these potential <br /> environmental issues would be precluded from detailed discussion in the Draft PEIR. Based upon <br /> the environmental analysis presented in the Draft PEIR, and the comments received by the public <br /> on the Draft PEIR, no substantial evidence was submitted to or identified by the City which <br /> indicated that the project would have an impact on the following environmental areas: <br /> (a) Agriculture and Forestry Resources: The City does not have any significant agricultural <br /> resources. Additionally, Santa Ana has no land designated or zoned for agricultural use and <br /> does not have any land subject to a Williamson Act contract. Santa Ana does not have any <br /> land designated or zoned for forestland, timberland, or zoned Timberland Production. <br /> (b) Wildfire: According to CAL FIRE, the nearest fire hazard severity zone (FHSZ) in an SRA to <br /> the City of Santa Ana is a high FHSZ about 4.0 miles east along the western edge of Loma <br /> Ridge. The nearest FHSZ in an LRA is about 3.8 miles away at the southern tip of the Peters <br /> Canyon Regional Park. The city is not in or near SRAs or lands classified as very high FHSZs. <br /> Additionally, no area in the city is on the wildland-urban interface. <br /> All other topical areas of evaluation included in the Environmental Checklist were determined to <br /> require further assessment in the Draft PEIR. <br /> B. IMPACTS DETERMINED TO BE LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT IN THE PEIR <br /> This section identifies impacts of the proposed project determined to be less than significant <br /> without implementation of project-specific mitigation measures. This determination, however, <br /> does assume compliance with existing regulations, as detailed in each respective topical section <br /> of Chapter 5 in the Updated Draft PEIR. <br /> (a) Aesthetics: Buildout under the GPU will be at a greater intensity/density in all five focus <br /> areas compared to existing conditions. While maximum height would generally be similar to <br /> existing buildings, the overall increase in allowed intensity and height across the focus areas <br /> would lead to a visually denser urban setting and alter Santa Ana's existing skyline. Buildout <br /> under the GPU would not have a substantial adverse effect on scenic vistas (such as the <br /> Santa Ana River and Santiago Creek) since these existing open space parcels would remain <br /> unchanged. Additionally, no state scenic highways, eligible or officially designated, traverse <br /> the city nor are located near the city. Therefore, the GPU would not damage scenic <br /> resources, including rock outcroppings, trees, and historic buildings within state scenic <br /> Santa Ana General Plan Update <br /> CE i i 5T ac an Statement 32 — 44 1 1 / 02 <br /> Of ve ri ing onsiderations -21- 6cq'Rer�0 2 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.