My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 32 - EIR No. 2020-03 and GPA No.2020-06 Santa Ana General Plan Update
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2022
>
01/18/2022 Regular & Special SA
>
Item 32 - EIR No. 2020-03 and GPA No.2020-06 Santa Ana General Plan Update
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2023 2:43:13 PM
Creation date
8/16/2023 2:43:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
32
Date
1/18/2022
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
319
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
residences along affected roadways. No individual measures and no set of feasible or practical <br /> mitigation measures are available to reduce project-generated traffic noise to less than significant <br /> levels in all cases. Thus, traffic noise would remain a significant and unavoidable impact. It should <br /> be noted that the identification of this program-level impact does not preclude the finding of less- <br /> than-significant impacts for subsequent projects analyzed at the project level. <br /> Mitigation Measures <br /> Refer to Mitigation Measure N-2, above. <br /> Finding <br /> Finding 3. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the GPU that avoid <br /> or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the PEIR. These <br /> changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measure above. The City of Santa Ana hereby <br /> finds that implementation of the mitigation measure is feasible, and the measure is therefore <br /> adopted. <br /> The City finds that there are no mitigation measures that are feasible, taking into consideration <br /> specific economic, legal, social, technological or other factors, that would mitigate this impact to <br /> a less-than-significant level, and further, that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or <br /> other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for <br /> highly trained workers, make infeasible the alternatives identified in the PEIR, as discussed in <br /> Section G of these Findings (Public Resources Code §§ 21081(a)(1), (3); Guidelines §§ <br /> 15091(a)(1), (3)). As described in the Statement of Overriding Considerations, the City has <br /> determined that this impact is acceptable because specific overriding economic, legal, social, <br /> technological, or other benefits, including regionwide or statewide environmental benefits, of the <br /> GPU outweigh its significant effects on the environment. <br /> 5. Population and Housing <br /> Impact 5.13-1: The GPU would directly induce substantial unplanned population growth. <br /> Support for this environmental impact conclusion is fully discussed in Section 5.13, Population <br /> and Housing, starting on page 5.13-12 of the Updated Draft PEIR. <br /> Full buildout of the GPU would result in a population of 431,629, and the city's 2045 population <br /> growth would be approximately 20 percent greater than the Orange County Council of <br /> Governments' 2045 projections. Furthermore, the city's housing units at buildout would be <br /> 115,053, which exceeds the Orange County Council of Governments' projection by 38 percent. <br /> There are no feasible mitigation measures to mitigate the population and housing growth at <br /> buildout, and impacts would be significant and unavoidable. <br /> Santa Ana General Plan Update <br /> CE i i 5T ac an Statement 32 — 74 1 1 / 02 <br /> Of ve ri ing onsiderations -51- 61A'Rer�0 2 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.