My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 08 - Nonprofit CDBG Application for Fiscal Years 2022-2024
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2021
>
11/02/2021 Regular and Special
>
Item 08 - Nonprofit CDBG Application for Fiscal Years 2022-2024
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/17/2023 8:38:07 AM
Creation date
8/17/2023 8:37:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Item #
8
Date
11/2/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Copy of City of Santa Ana Community <br />Development Block Grant FY 2022- 2024 (Nonprofit Application) <br /> <br /> 6 <br /> <br /> <br />CDBG CRITERIA FOR ALLOCATING POINTS <br />2022 - 2024 CDBG Application Guidelines <br /> <br />COMMUNITY NEEDS <br />1. Did organization identify <br />nature of the program and <br />demonstrate community <br />need for the target <br />population group (i.e. youth, <br />seniors, disabled) <br /> 10 Points <br /> Applicant identifies the nature of the program and <br />demonstrates need for the target population. = 10 Pts. <br /> Applicant does not identify the nature of the program and did <br />not demonstrate need for the target population. = 5 Pts. <br /> Applicant only identifies State or National data = 0 Pts. <br />2. Did applicant meet a specific <br /> City Consolidated Plan goal and <br /> priority and stated correlation <br /> to proposed program? <br />10 Points <br /> Applicant met a specific Consolidated Plan goal and priority <br />and correlation to proposed program was clear= 10 Pts <br /> Applicant met a specific Consolidated Plan goal and priority <br />but did not clearly state the correlation to proposed <br />program= 5 Pts <br /> Applicant did not meet any plan goal or priority= 0 Pts. <br />CAPACITY TO PROVIDE PUBLIC SERVICES <br />3. Did the organization provide <br /> a summary and listing of the <br /> admin and program staff? <br /> 20 Points <br /> <br /> Organization provided summary and staff listing of all admin <br />and program to fully execute proposed program=20 Pts <br /> Organization did not provide both summary and staff listing of <br />all admin and program staff =10 Pts <br /> Organization provided summary and staff listing of all admin <br />and program staff but does not have the capacity to fully <br />execute proposed program=5 Pts <br /> Organization did not provide summary and staff listing of all <br />Admin and program=0 Pts <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />EXPERIENCE <br />4. Years of experience providing <br /> the proposed program? <br />10 Points <br /> <br /> <br /> 5 or more years of experience providing proposed program=10 <br />Pts <br /> 2-4 years of experience providing proposed program=5 Pts <br /> 1 year of experience providing proposed program=3 Pts <br /> 0 years of experience providing proposed program=0 Pts <br /> <br /> 5. Does the applicant have <br /> experience administering <br /> CDBG and/or any other <br /> Federal Grants? <br />10 Points <br /> Applicant has experience administering CDBG and other Federal <br />Grant programs=10 Pts. <br /> Applicant only has experience administering CDBG <br />programs=5Pts. <br /> Applicant has no experience administering CDBG and/or Federal <br />Grant programs=0 Pts. <br /> <br />EXHIBIT 1
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.