Laserfiche WebLink
Appeal Application Nos. 2020-03 and 2020-04 — Central Pointe Mixed -Use Development <br />January 19, 2021 <br />Page 11 <br />development materially assist in accomplishing the goal of providing affordable <br />housing opportunities throughout the City. The Commission failed to address this <br />issue and the Project may not qualify to come under the Santa Ana Housing <br />Opportunity Ordinance, Santa Ana Municipal Code Section 41-1607 and Public <br />Resources Code Section 15162." <br />Staff Response — The Project does not include on site affordable housing units and <br />is not required to pay an in lieu fee. The Housing Opportunity Ordinance (HOO) <br />Chapter 41, Article XVIII.I was amended by the City Council on September 1, 2020. <br />As amended, Section 1902(a) and (b) the HOO now only applies when a residential <br />project which proposes a residential density above the General Plan permitted <br />density. The Central Pointe Mixed -Use Project is consistent with the General Plan <br />District Center land use designation. No General Plan Amendment is required for <br />the Project. Therefore, the HOO (on site units or in lieu fee) does not apply. <br />Furthermore, Santa Ana Municipal Code Section 41-1607, entitled "Deviations from <br />density bonus and affordable housing provisions," applies to projects seeking a <br />density bonus or waivers and modifications from development standards. The <br />Project does not seek a density bonus and complies with the development standards <br />of the Metro East Mixed -Use overlay zone. <br />b. SWRCC attests that, "The Planning Commission failed to adequately address the <br />well being of the community in ensuring that qualified Santa Ana residents, veterans <br />and graduates or certificate holders of the Santa Ana Unified School District and <br />Rancho Santiago Community College District are provided a process to be included <br />as part of the workforce constructing the Project." <br />Staff Response — The Planning Commission's responsibilities include decisions <br />regarding land use and zoning as prescribed by ordinance. There is no City <br />ordinance requiring workforce agreements for private development projects. <br />c. SWRCC states, "Failure of the Planning Commission to ensure the maximum <br />amount of viable commercial development on the project ... The failure to require <br />the maximum viable square footage of commercial space will lead to greater <br />vehicle trips from the residents to commercial areas both within Santa Ana ... areas <br />that are already inundated with traffic, and also Tustin, sending sales tax revenue <br />out of Santa Ana. This traffic increase is due to inadequate commercial sites that <br />will exist to serve these new residents was not adequately studied by the <br />commission, something required under California environmental laws." <br />Staff Response — The Metro East Mixed -Use Overlay, Active Urban subzone permits <br />mixed -use development. The Project proposes 644 residential units and 15,130 <br />square feet of commercial space. The Metro East Mixed -Use Overlay does not <br />require a minimum amount of commercial square footage for a mixed -use <br />development. As presented to the Planning Commission the applicant retained the <br />