Correspondence - #21 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

DOWDALL LAW OFFICES A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION ATTORNEYS AT LAW City of Santa Ana August 28, 2023 Page 4 ideals by any vote. The procedure to change the charter is set forth in the charter, itself. See, Santa Ana city charter, § 1500 (below). If the city proposes to change the rent control law by imposing a super majority vote, a charter amendment is required. A charter amendment would be required to specify that ordinances having to deal with compulsory government interdiction of rental prices may only be entertained upon a super majority vote, when and if approved by the electorate. Sec. 1500. - Amendments to charter. Amendments to this charter shall be proposed and submitted to the electors of the City in the manner provided by the Constitution of the State of California. Without an amendment to the charter, the Council would be violating its terms and subject to criminal prosecution. The charter says: Sec. 1501. - Violations. The violation of any provision of this charter shall be deemed a misdemeanor and be punishable upon conviction in the same manner as provided in the Penal Code of the State of California as the same now reads or as hereafter amended. (Ord. No. NS-2074, § 9, 8-6-90, approved at election 11-6-90)4 The legislative privilege would not apply to actions which require city Council approval, when the policy to do so promotes the violation of civil rights. Each individual Council member is subject to punishment in the event that the ordinances squelch on the grounds that its effect would be to deprive the citizens of Santa Ana have the right to vote, and to deprive the mobilehome park owners have the right to enforcement of ordinances duly enacted in accordance with the majority vote requirements of the charter and the government code. These are the policies subverted by intended proposed and collective effort of individuals sitting on the city Council. Due to the importance of indicating the rights to enforce democracy, the city would be liable for private attorney general attorneys fees for the actions taken to set aside and squelch the subversive legislative tactics sought to be employed by passing the proposed ordinance. Santa Ana would be hard-pressed to explain to the taxpayers why they are footing the bill for the illicit, 4 The ordinance would also be a violation of the state law which provides: Government Code §36900. Violation as misdemeanor or infraction; Prosecution or redress; Penalties "(a) Violation of a city ordinance is a misdemeanor unless by ordinance it is made an infraction. The violation of a city ordinance may be prosecuted by city authorities in the name of the people of the State of California, or redressed by civil action."